Literature DB >> 10708180

Sequential single doses of cisapride, erythromycin, and metoclopramide in critically ill patients intolerant to enteral nutrition: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

R MacLaren1, D A Kuhl, J M Gervasio, R O Brown, R N Dickerson, T N Livingston, K Swift, S Headley, K A Kudsk, J J Lima.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of enteral cisapride, metoclopramide, erythromycin, and placebo for promoting gastric emptying in critically ill patients with intolerance to gastric enteral nutrition (EN).
DESIGN: A randomized, crossover study.
SETTING: Adult medical intensive care unit at a university-affiliated private hospital and trauma intensive care unit at a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Ten adult, critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients not tolerating a fiber-containing EN product defined as a single aspirated gastric residual volume >150 mL or two aspirated gastric residual volumes >120 mL during a 12-hr period.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients received 10 mg of cisapride, 200 mg of erythromycin ethylsuccinate, 10 mg of metoclopramide, and placebo as 20 mL of sterile water every 12 hrs over 48 hrs. Acetaminophen solution (1000 mg) was administered concurrently. Gastric residual volumes were assessed, and plasma acetaminophen concentrations were serially determined by TDx between 0 and 12 hrs to evaluate gastric emptying.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Gastric residual volumes during the study were not significantly different between agents. No differences in area under the concentration vs. time curve or elimination rate constant were identified between agents. Metoclopramide and cisapride had a significantly shorter mean residence time of absorption than erythromycin (6.3+/-4.5 [SEM] mins and 10.9+/-5.8 vs. 30.1+/-4.5 mins, respectively [p<.05]). Metoclopramide (9.7+/-15.3 mins) had a significantly shorter time to peak concentration compared with erythromycin and placebo (60.7+/-8.1 and 50.9+/-13.5 mins, respectively [p<.05]). The time to onset of absorption was significantly shorter for metoclopramide vs. cisapride (5.7+/-4.5 vs. 22.9+/-5.7 mins [p<.05]).
CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients intolerant to EN, single enteral doses of metoclopramide or cisapride are effective for promoting gastric emptying in critically ill patients with gastric motility dysfunction. Additionally, metoclopramide may provide a quicker onset than cisapride.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10708180     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200002000-00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  12 in total

Review 1.  Nutritional support in the critically ill child.

Authors:  Parvathi U Iyer
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  Pharmacological therapy of feed intolerance in the critically ills.

Authors:  Nam Q Nguyen
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-08-06

Review 3.  Nutritional Support In The Critically Ill Child.

Authors:  Uma Raju; Sanjay Choudhary; M M Harjai
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 4.  Current issues on safety of prokinetics in critically ill patients with feed intolerance.

Authors:  Nam Q Nguyen; Swee Lin Chen Yi Mei
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2011-10

5.  A novel method for insertion of post-pyloric feeding tubes at the bedside without endoscopic or fluoroscopic assistance: a prospective study.

Authors:  Cornelis Slagt; Richard Innes; David Bihari; John Lawrence; Yahya Shehabi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Drug interaction leading to prolonged sedation in a postoperative high risk coronary bypass surgery patient.

Authors:  Shrikant Bobade; Vinay Kulkarni; Sudhir Dhumne; Saurabh Barde; Jitesh Chauhan; Avinash Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-01

7.  Gastrointestinal function in intensive care patients: terminology, definitions and management. Recommendations of the ESICM Working Group on Abdominal Problems.

Authors:  Annika Reintam Blaser; Manu L N G Malbrain; Joel Starkopf; Sonja Fruhwald; Stephan M Jakob; Jan De Waele; Jan-Peter Braun; Martijn Poeze; Claudia Spies
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Effects of Rikkunshito (traditional Japanese medicine) on enteral feeding and the plasma ghrelin level in critically ill patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mineji Hayakawa; Yuichi Ono; Takeshi Wada; Yuichiro Yanagida; Atsushi Sawamura; Hiroshi Takeda; Satoshi Gando
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2014-09-02

9.  The effect of camicinal (GSK962040), a motilin agonist, on gastric emptying and glucose absorption in feed-intolerant critically ill patients: a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.

Authors:  Marianne J Chapman; Adam M Deane; Stephanie L O'Connor; Nam Q Nguyen; Robert J L Fraser; Duncan B Richards; Kimberley E Hacquoil; Lakshmi S Vasist Johnson; Matthew E Barton; George E Dukes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  The efficacy and safety of prokinetic agents in critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Kim Lewis; Zuhoor Alqahtani; Lauralyn Mcintyre; Saleh Almenawer; Fayez Alshamsi; Andrew Rhodes; Laura Evans; Derek C Angus; Waleed Alhazzani
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.