| Literature DB >> 25133043 |
Abstract
Feed intolerance in the setting of critical illness is associated with higher morbidity and mortality, and thus requires promptly and effective treatment. Prokinetic agents are currently considered as the first-line therapy given issues relating to parenteral nutrition and post-pyloric placement. Currently, the agents of choice are erythromycin and metoclopramide, either alone or in combination, which are highly effective with relatively low incidence of cardiac, hemodynamic or neurological adverse effects. Diarrhea, however, can occur in up to 49% of patients who are treated with the dual prokinetic therapy, which is not associated with Clostridium difficile infection and settled soon after the cessation of the drugs. Hence, the use of prokinetic therapy over a long period or for prophylactic purpose must be avoided, and the indication for ongoing use of the drug(s) must be reviewed frequently. Second line therapy, such as total parenteral nutrition and post-pyloric feeding, must be considered once adverse effects relating the prokinetic therapy develop.Entities:
Keywords: Adverse effects; Critical illness; Enteral feeding; Feed intolerance; Prokinetic therapy
Year: 2014 PMID: 25133043 PMCID: PMC4133440 DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i3.148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther ISSN: 2150-5349