Literature DB >> 10708177

Nadroparin versus dalteparin anticoagulation in high-volume, continuous venovenous hemofiltration: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.

A C de Pont1, H M Oudemans-van Straaten, K J Roozendaal, D F Zandstra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare filter survival times during high-volume, continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with normal coagulation variables, using anti-factor Xa bioequivalent doses of nadroparin and dalteparin. To evaluate which other factors influence filter survival time.
DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, double-blind, crossover study.
SETTING: An 18-bed intensive care unit in a 530-bed teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-two critically ill patients with renal failure, treated with high-volume, continuous venovenous hemofiltration.
INTERVENTIONS: High-volume, postdilutional continuous venovenous hemofiltration, with a standard blood flow rate of 200 mL/min and an ultrafiltrate volume of 100 L in 24 hrs, was performed with a highly permeable, large-surface cellulose triacetate membrane. Anticoagulation with anti-Xa bioequivalent doses of nadroparin and dalteparin was administered in the extracorporeal line before the filter. Blood was sampled for determination of coagulation variables before hemofiltration, 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 12 hrs after starting the treatment, and at the end of the hemofiltration run.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Anti-Xa peak activity, time of anti-Xa peak activity, area under the curve for 0-3 hrs and filter survival time were not significantly different using nadroparin or dalteparin. When analyzing the patients according to the length of filter survival time, no relationship among anti-Xa peak activity, area under the curve for 0-3 hrs, and filter survival time was found. However, there was a strong trend toward a negative correlation between baseline platelet count and filter survival time (r2 = .11; p = .07). Mean blood urea nitrogen decreased from 81.0+/-31.9 to 41.1+/-21.2 mg/dL (p<.01) and mean creatinine decreased from 3.4+/-1.8 to 1.9+/-1.2 mg/dL (p<.01). There were no clinically important bleeding complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Nadroparin and dalteparin are bioequivalent with respect to their anti-Xa activities. Using either drug, we did not find a difference in filter survival time during high-volume, continuous venovenous hemofiltration. No relationship between anti-Xa activity and filter survival time could be found. However, there is a strong trend toward a negative correlation between baseline platelet count and filter survival time. This suggests that during high-volume, continuous venovenous hemofiltration, patients with a higher baseline platelet count might need a different anticoagulation regimen to obtain longer filter survival times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10708177     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200002000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  13 in total

Review 1.  Anticoagulation strategies in continuous renal replacement therapy: can the choice be evidence based?

Authors:  H M Oudemans-van Straaten; J P J Wester; A C J M de Pont; M R C Schetz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  CRRT - still far from being a standardised BEST treatment?

Authors:  Michael Joannidis; Lui G Forni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Dalteparin: an update of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  C J Dunn; B Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Anticoagulation in patients with acute kidney injury undergoing kidney replacement therapy.

Authors:  Rupesh Raina; Ronith Chakraborty; Andrew Davenport; Patrick Brophy; Sidharth Sethi; Mignon McCulloch; Timothy Bunchman; Hui Kim Yap
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.651

5.  Enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration: a randomized controlled crossover study.

Authors:  Michael Joannidis; Jordan Kountchev; Markus Rauchenzauner; Nicola Schusterschitz; Hanno Ulmer; Andreas Mayr; Romuald Bellmann
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Normal citratemia and metabolic tolerance of citrate anticoagulation for hemodiafiltration in severe septic shock burn patients.

Authors:  Filippo Mariano; Luisa Tedeschi; Maurizio Morselli; Maurizio Stella; Giorgio Triolo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Hiraku Tsujimoto; Yasushi Tsujimoto; Yukihiko Nakata; Tomoko Fujii; Sei Takahashi; Mai Akazawa; Yuki Kataoka
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-03-13

8.  The effects of continuous venovenous hemofiltration on coagulation activation.

Authors:  Catherine S C Bouman; Anne-Cornélie J M de Pont; Joost C M Meijers; Kamran Bakhtiari; Dorina Roem; Sacha Zeerleder; Gertjan Wolbink; Johanna C Korevaar; Marcel Levi; Evert de Jonge
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Anticoagulant properties of drotrecogin alfa (activated) during hemofiltration in patients with severe sepsis.

Authors:  Anne C J M de Pont; Marcus J Schultz
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Clinical review: Patency of the circuit in continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Michael Joannidis; Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.