Filippo Mariano1, Luisa Tedeschi2, Maurizio Morselli3, Maurizio Stella4, Giorgio Triolo5. 1. Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Department of Medicine Area, CTO Hospital, Via G. Zuretti 29, 10126, Turin, Italy. filippo.mariano@poste.it. 2. Intensive Care Unit, Department of Emergency and Intensive Care, CTO Hospital, Turin, Italy. 3. Clinical Pathology Unit, Department of Medicine Area, CTO Hospital, Turin, Italy. 4. Burns Unit, Department of Plastic Surgery, CTO Hospital, Turin, Italy. 5. Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Department of Medicine Area, CTO Hospital, Via G. Zuretti 29, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Anticoagulation during renal replacement therapy remains an important challenge for burn patients due to their high risk of bleeding. In this study we compared the efficacy and safety of citrate anticoagulation to heparin anticoagulation for hemodiafiltration (HDF) in severe burn patients, focusing on metabolic tolerance and handling of citrate. METHODS: Retrospective observational study (January 2000-December 2007) at a university teaching hospital. Among 548 patients admitted with burns, 70 severe burn septic shock patients (median age 57.5 years, interquartile range 42-76 years; median burned surface area 40%, interquartile range 30-60%) who underwent HDF for more than 24 h were included. RESULTS: Of the 70 HDF patients, 31 at high risk of bleeding were treated with citrate and 39 with heparin, with a mortality rate of 70.9 and 71.8%, respectively. In continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), the filter survival was higher with citrate, and hemorrhagic complications were lower (0.035 vs. 0.145 episodes/day, respectively). During citrate CVVHDF [median delivered dialysis dose: 578.9 ml kg(-1) day(-1) (461.5-769.2 ml kg(-1) day(-1))] in catecholamine-supported patients (norepinephrine 0.53 μg kg(-1) min(-1)), no metabolic derangements in pH, bicarbonates, Na+, K+, Ca++, and ionized calcium were observed. Systemic citratemia was within the normal range (<0.4 mmol/l) and was associated with a marked citrate removal in the effluent (5 patients, 36-60% of infused amount). CONCLUSIONS: In septic shock burn patients, citrate for CVVHDF was efficient and safe, and superior to heparin for hemorrhagic complications and filter survival. Observed metabolic stability was most likely due to a marked loss of citrate in effluent volume and subsequent low total citrate load for the patient.
PURPOSE: Anticoagulation during renal replacement therapy remains an important challenge for burn patients due to their high risk of bleeding. In this study we compared the efficacy and safety of citrate anticoagulation to heparin anticoagulation for hemodiafiltration (HDF) in severe burn patients, focusing on metabolic tolerance and handling of citrate. METHODS: Retrospective observational study (January 2000-December 2007) at a university teaching hospital. Among 548 patients admitted with burns, 70 severe burn septic shock patients (median age 57.5 years, interquartile range 42-76 years; median burned surface area 40%, interquartile range 30-60%) who underwent HDF for more than 24 h were included. RESULTS: Of the 70 HDF patients, 31 at high risk of bleeding were treated with citrate and 39 with heparin, with a mortality rate of 70.9 and 71.8%, respectively. In continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), the filter survival was higher with citrate, and hemorrhagic complications were lower (0.035 vs. 0.145 episodes/day, respectively). During citrate CVVHDF [median delivered dialysis dose: 578.9 ml kg(-1) day(-1) (461.5-769.2 ml kg(-1) day(-1))] in catecholamine-supported patients (norepinephrine 0.53 μg kg(-1) min(-1)), no metabolic derangements in pH, bicarbonates, Na+, K+, Ca++, and ionized calcium were observed. Systemic citratemia was within the normal range (<0.4 mmol/l) and was associated with a marked citrate removal in the effluent (5 patients, 36-60% of infused amount). CONCLUSIONS: In septic shock burn patients, citrate for CVVHDF was efficient and safe, and superior to heparin for hemorrhagic complications and filter survival. Observed metabolic stability was most likely due to a marked loss of citrate in effluent volume and subsequent low total citrate load for the patient.
Authors: J Hubsher; A R Olshan; A B Schwartz; B Zoranski; F DeClement; A Bendlin; D Hensell; J H Brezin; L E Krevolin; J L Chinitz Journal: ASAIO Trans Date: 1986 Jul-Sep
Authors: Kevin K Chung; Jonathan B Lundy; James R Matson; Evan M Renz; Christopher E White; Booker T King; David J Barillo; John A Jones; Leopoldo C Cancio; Lorne H Blackbourne; Steven E Wolf Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Filippo Mariano; Vincenzo Cantaluppi; Maurizio Stella; Giuseppe Mauriello Romanazzi; Barbara Assenzio; Monica Cairo; Luigi Biancone; Giorgio Triolo; V Marco Ranieri; Giovanni Camussi Journal: Crit Care Date: 2008-03-25 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Renato A Caires; Regina C R M Abdulkader; Verônica T Costa E Silva; Gillene S Ferreira; Emmanuel A Burdmann; Luis Yu; Etienne Macedo Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2015-08-23 Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: Christopher J Pino; Alexander S Yevzlin; Kyungsoo Lee; Angela J Westover; Peter L Smith; Deborah A Buffington; H David Humes Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 5.992