Literature DB >> 10707924

Values and limitations of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography with preoperative evaluation of patients with pancreatic masses.

C G Diederichs1, L Staib, J Vogel, B Glasbrenner, G Glatting, H J Brambs, H G Beger, S N Reske.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the value and limitations of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-position-emission tomography (PET) for differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic disease and for staging malignant disease. One hundred fifty-nine patients with 89 malignant and 70 benign pancreatic lesions all received PET, computed tomography (CT), and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) before pancreatic surgery. The original reports were compared for all patients (group I; N = 159), for a subgroup that neither had fasting plasma glucose levels > or =130 mg/dL or known elevated levels of C-reactive protein ([CRP], group II; n = 123), and for the remaining patients (group III; n = 36). For group I, accuracy values (areas under receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curves) for differentiation of benign/malignant masses were 0.86 (PET), 0.93 (ERCP), 0.82 (CT), and 0.95 for ERCP + PET (N = 159). For group II, ROC areas increased to 0.92 (PET), 0.94 (p < 0.05; n = 123) (ERCP), 0.82 (CT), 0.97 (p < 0.05; n = 123) (ERCP + PET). The results for group III were 0.71 (PET), 0.81 (CT), and 0.93 (ERCP); (n = 36). With 54 patients of group II that either had contradictory or indeterminate/technically unsuccessful CT/ERCP, PET was correct in 43 patients (84%). Sensitivity/specificity for lymph node staging was 49%/63%, respectively. For patients with hepatic metastasis, PET was 70% sensitive and 95% specific, missing some metastasis that were <1 cm. PET detected peritoneal metastasis in 25% of patients, missing poorly localized microscopic spread. For selected patients who have indeterminate pancreatic masses but no hyperglycemia or serologic evidence of active inflammation, FDG-PET is an independent functional assay that significantly adds to the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP and CT in the differentiation of benign and malignant pancreatic disease. PET can reliably detect hepatic, peritoneal, and other distant metastases that are > or =1 cm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10707924     DOI: 10.1097/00006676-200003000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreas        ISSN: 0885-3177            Impact factor:   3.327


  27 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of pancreatic cancer using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Naomi Alazraki
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Preoperative assessment of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Hisashi Imai; Ryuichiro Doi; Hiroyuki Kanazawa; Naoko Kamo; Masayuki Koizumi; Toshihiko Masui; Yasuhiro Iwanaga; Yoshiya Kawaguchi; Yasutsugu Takada; Hiroyoshi Isoda; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Utility of fusion CT-PET in the diagnosis of small pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Brian Kim-Poh Goh; Yu-Meng Tan; Yaw-Fui Alexander Chung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Lujaien A Kadhim; Avani S Dholakia; Joseph M Herman; Richard L Wahl; Muhammad A Chaudhry
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-10-30

5.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomography influences on the management of resectable pancreatic cancer and its cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Stefan Heinrich; Gerhard W Goerres; Markus Schäfer; Markus Sagmeister; Peter Bauerfeind; Bernhard C Pestalozzi; Thomas F Hany; Gustav K von Schulthess; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of patients with cystic tumors of the pancreas.

Authors:  C Sperti; C Pasquali; F Chierichetti; G Liessi; G Ferlin; S Pedrazzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Utility of PET/CT in diagnosis, staging, assessment of resectability and metabolic response of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Yi Wang; Feng Yang; Chen Jin; De-Liang Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Staging cancer of the pancreas.

Authors:  G Morana; L Cancian; R Pozzi Mucelli; C Cugini
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 9.  Approaches to localized pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Martin Loos; Jörg Kleeff; Helmut Friess; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  p-[123I]iodo-L-phenylalanine for detection of pancreatic cancer: basic investigations of the uptake characteristics in primary human pancreatic tumour cells and evaluation in in vivo models of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Samuel Samnick; Bernd F M Romeike; Boris Kubuschok; Dirk Hellwig; Michaela Amon; Wolfgang Feiden; Michael D Menger; Carl-Martin Kirsch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.