Literature DB >> 10707798

18-FDG-PET for the assessment of residual masses on CT following treatment of lymphomas.

N G Mikhaeel1, A R Timothy, S F Hain, M J O'Doherty.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The problem of residual masses on post-treatment CT scans is a continuing dilemma for the oncologist treating malignant lymphomas. These masses may contain active disease or represent only necrotic tumour which continues to shrink without further treatment or post-treatment fibrosis which remains stable on continued follow-up. 18-FDG-PET offers a novel metabolic imaging modality, which can differentiate malignant from benign tissue on the basis of increased glycolytic activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients (15 with Hodgkin's disease (HD) and 17 with aggressive histology non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)) who had residual masses on their post-treatment CT scans underwent 18-FDG-PET. The post-treatment CT and PET scans were compared and the accuracy of the 18-FDG-PET in assessing residual masses was evaluated using clinical and pathological follow-up data.
RESULTS: Nine patients had positive post-treatment 18-FDG-PET, eight (89%) of whom have relapsed. Twenty-three patients had negative post-treatment PET with only two relapses in this group. The 2 patients who relapsed had aggressive NHL while none of the 11 HD patients with negative PET relapsed. The median follow-up of patients in continued complete remission is 38 months.
CONCLUSIONS: 18-FDG-PET can differentiate between residual masses containing viable lymphoma where further treatment will be required to achieve cure and those representing ablated disease, where unnecessary treatment and additional morbidity may be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10707798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  16 in total

Review 1.  Positron emission tomography and gallium metabolic imaging in lymphoma.

Authors:  B Coiffier
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  My treatment approach to patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  James O Armitage
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomography surveillance in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma in first remission has a low positive predictive value and high costs.

Authors:  Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly; Karen Juul Mylam; Peter Brown; Lena Specht; Ilse Christiansen; Lars Munksgaard; Hans Erik Johnsen; Annika Loft; Anne Bukh; Victor Iyer; Anne Lerberg Nielsen; Martin Hutchings
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Use of FDG-PET to monitor response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with lymphomas.

Authors:  N George Mikhaeel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group.

Authors:  Sally F Barrington; N George Mikhaeel; Lale Kostakoglu; Michel Meignan; Martin Hutchings; Stefan P Müeller; Lawrence H Schwartz; Emanuele Zucca; Richard I Fisher; Judith Trotman; Otto S Hoekstra; Rodney J Hicks; Michael J O'Doherty; Roland Hustinx; Alberto Biggi; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; Richard I Fisher; Sally F Barrington; Franco Cavalli; Lawrence H Schwartz; Emanuele Zucca; T Andrew Lister
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET/CT for clinical evaluation at the end of treatment of HL and NHL: a comparison of the Deauville Criteria (DC) and the International Harmonization Project Criteria (IHPC).

Authors:  Federico Fallanca; Pierpaolo Alongi; Elena Incerti; Luigi Gianolli; Maria Picchio; Irfan Kayani; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Positron emission tomographic scans in lymphoma: convention and controversy.

Authors:  Stephen M Ansell; James O Armitage
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Standardized uptake value on FDG-PET as a marker for disease activity in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: comparison with serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor values.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Hiroyuki Sugahara; Ichiro Higuchi; Hiroki Fukunaga; Hironobu Nakamura; Yuzuru Kanakura; Jun Hatazawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  Limitations of PET for imaging lymphoma.

Authors:  Sally F Barrington; Michael J O'Doherty
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.