Literature DB >> 10707392

Reoperation after primary posterior instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Toward defining late operative site pain of unknown cause.

S Cook1, M Asher, S M Lai, J Shobe.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency and categorize the indications for reoperation in three implant systems (Harrington, Cotrel-Dubousset [C-D], and Isola). To define late operative site pain (LOSP) of no apparent cause as an indication for implant removal and determine the success of implant removal in relieving LOSP. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Late operative site pain of no apparent cause has been discussed briefly in the literature but has not been investigated as a major indication for implant removal.
METHODS: One hundred eighty-two of 190 consecutive patients with idiopathic scoliosis (96%) who underwent primary surgery between January 1, 1981, and December 31, 1992, by one surgeon in one hospital, with use of Harrington, C-D, or Isola instrumentation were studied an average of 9 years after surgery to determine the indications for and frequency of reoperation.
RESULTS: The overall frequency of reoperation for all instrumentation types combined was 19%: Harrington, 19%; C-D, 24%; and Isola, 14%. By 6 years' follow-up the cumulative risk of reoperation by Kaplan-Meier analysis was Harrington, 14%; C-D, 21%; and Isola, 14%. (statistically nonsignificant difference). The most frequent indication for reoperation was LOSP of no apparent cause: 8% (14 patients) for all instrumentation types combined. The average interval between the initial operation and reoperation for LOSP was 46 months (range, 20-97 months). The frequency of each implant type was Harrington, 6%; C-D, 12%; and Isola, 6%. By 6 years' follow-up, the cumulative Kaplan-Meier risk for reoperation due to LOSP was Harrington, 5%; C-D, 13%; and Isola, 8% (statistically non-significant difference). Of the 14 patients who had instrumentation removal for LOSP, 10 (71%) had successful relief of pain after implant removal.
CONCLUSIONS: Occurring regardless of implant type, LOSP of no apparent cause after posterior instrumentation of scoliosis is a distinct clinical entity and is relieved by implant removal in most patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10707392     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200002150-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

1.  Metal levels in corrosion of spinal implants.

Authors:  Javier del Rio; Jose Beguiristain; Julio Duart
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Serum titanium, niobium and aluminium levels two years following instrumented spinal fusion in children: does implant surface area predict serum metal ion levels?

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; William J Cundy; Georgia Antoniou; Leanne M Sutherland; Brian J C Freeman; Peter J Cundy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Deep wound infection following pediatric scoliosis surgery: incidence and analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  Sami Aleissa; David Parsons; John Grant; James Harder; Jason Howard
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Late implant infections caused by Propionibacterium acnes in scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Frederik Hahn; Reinhard Zbinden; Kan Min
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Efficacy of spinal implant removal after thoracolumbar junction fusion.

Authors:  Seok Won Kim; Chang Il Ju; Chong Gue Kim; Seung Myung Lee; Ho Shin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2008-03-20

6.  The diagnosis and management of infection following instrumented spinal fusion.

Authors:  Iona Collins; James Wilson-MacDonald; George Chami; Will Burgoyne; P Vinayakam; Tony Berendt; Jeremy Fairbank
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The outcome of pedicle screw instrumentation removal for ongoing low back pain following posterolateral lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Mario G Zotti; Oscar P Brumby-Rendell; Ben McDonald; Tom Fisher; Christovalantis Tsimiklis; Wai Weng Yoon; Orso L Osti
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12

8.  Survivorship analysis of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  J Bago; M Ramirez; F Pellise; C Villanueva
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Impact of Increasing Age on Outcomes of Spinal Fusion in Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Terence Verla; Owoicho Adogwa; Ulysses Toche; S Harrison Farber; Frank Petraglia; Kelly R Murphy; Steven Thomas; Parastou Fatemi; Oren Gottfried; Carlos A Bagley; Shivanand P Lad
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.104

10.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated with arthrodesis and posterior titanium instrumentation: 8 to 12 years follow up without late infection.

Authors:  Franz J Mueller; Herbert Gluch
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2009-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.