Literature DB >> 10707389

Noninvasive three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex. An experimental examination.

W H Castro1, A Sautmann, M Schilgen, M Sautmann.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Experimental examination in vivo.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the precision of the ultrasound-based Coordinate Measuring System (CMS 50; Zebris Medizintechnik GmbH, D-88316, Isny, Germany) and then to establish a reference range for the active range of motion of the cervical spine in normal test subjects grouped according to age and sex. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Many different devices such as inclinometers, goniometers, potentiometers, computer-aided devices, and radiographic procedures have been developed to examine the range of motion of the cervical spine. All of them have more or less inherent limitations.
METHODS: To assess the precision of this examination method, preliminary experiments were performed including intraobserver retest and two-observer repeatability, intraindividual variability, a daily profile, and a comparison between active and passive motions. In the subsequent main experiment 157 persons (86 women and 71 men) were examined during active motion. The sex groups were further subdivided into age groups of 10 years each. A comparison of weight and athletic activity was also performed.
RESULTS: The range of motion decreased with increasing age, increasing body weight, and decreasing athletic activity. The rotation in the upper cervical spine increases with age to compensate for the reduced range of motion in the lower levels. Women showed significantly better mobility than men of the same age, only above the age of 70.
CONCLUSIONS: The CMS 50 device provides precise reproducible measurements of the active range of motion of the cervical spine in all three planes. Criteria such as age, sex, body weight, and athletic activity influence the range of motion of the cervical spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10707389     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200002150-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

1.  Analysis of head movements coupled with trunk drift in healthy subjects.

Authors:  S Miyaoka; H Hirano; I Ashida; Y Miyaoka; Y Yamada
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Cervical range of movement in relation to neck dimension.

Authors:  Jeremy Reynolds; D Marsh; Heiko Koller; Juliane Zenenr; G Bannister
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A 3D motion analysis study comparing the effectiveness of cervical spine orthoses at restricting spinal motion through physiological ranges.

Authors:  Nicholas Rhys Evans; Georgina Hooper; Rachel Edwards; Gemma Whatling; Valerie Sparkes; Cathy Holt; Sashin Ahuja
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  On the relevance of surrogate parameter deduction in biomedical research: mediated regression analysis for variance explanation of cervical range of motion.

Authors:  Daniel Niederer; Lutz Vogt; Jan Wilke; Winfried Banzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Influence of movement speed on cervical range of motion.

Authors:  Bruno Bonnechère; Patrick Salvia; Pierre-Michel Dugailly; Laura Maroye; Bernard Van Geyt; Véronique Feipel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Clinical and statistical correlation of various lumbar pathological conditions.

Authors:  J Michael Johnson; Mohamed Mahfouz; Nicholas V Battaglia; Adrija Sharma; Joseph S Cheng; Richard D Komistek
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Co-occurrence of outlet impingement syndrome of the shoulder and restricted range of motion in the thoracic spine--a prospective study with ultrasound-based motion analysis.

Authors:  Christina Theisen; Ad van Wagensveld; Nina Timmesfeld; Turgay Efe; Thomas J Heyse; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Markus D Schofer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Age-related cutoffs for cervical movement behaviour to distinguish chronic idiopathic neck pain patients from unimpaired subjects.

Authors:  Daniel Niederer; Lutz Vogt; Jan Wilke; Marcus Rickert; Winfried Banzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Motion analysis in cervical dystonia.

Authors:  Cristina Boccagni; Jacopo Carpaneto; Silvestro Micera; Sergio Bagnato; Giuseppe Galardi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  C2-fractures: part II. A morphometrical analysis of computerized atlantoaxial motion, anatomical alignment and related clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Rosemarie Forstner; Juliane Zenner; Herbert Resch; Mark Tauber; Stefan Lederer; Alexander Auffarth; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.