Literature DB >> 10700737

Comparing diagnostic tests: a simple graphic using likelihood ratios.

B J Biggerstaff1.   

Abstract

The diagnostic abilities of two or more diagnostic tests are traditionally compared by their respective sensitivities and specificities, either separately or using a summary of them such as Youden's index. Several authors have argued that the likelihood ratios provide a more appropriate, if in practice a less intuitive, comparison. We present a simple graphic which incorporates all these measures and admits easily interpreted comparison of two or more diagnostic tests. We show, using likelihood ratios and this graphic, that a test can be superior to a competitor in terms of predictive values while having either sensitivity or specificity smaller. A decision theoretic basis for the interpretation of the graph is given by relating it to the tent graph of Hilden and Glasziou (Statistics in Medicine, 1996). Finally, a brief example comparing two serodiagnostic tests for Lyme disease is presented. Published in 2000 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10700737     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000315)19:5<649::aid-sim371>3.0.co;2-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  54 in total

Review 1.  Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable.

Authors:  Les Irwig; Patrick Bossuyt; Paul Glasziou; Constantine Gatsonis; Jeroen Lijmer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

2.  Improving the specificity of recombinant immunoassays for lyme disease.

Authors:  Richard Porwancher
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Interpretation of amniotic fluid white blood cell count in "bloody tap" amniocenteses in women with symptoms of preterm labor.

Authors:  Sonya S Abdel-Razeq; Irina A Buhimschi; Mert O Bahtiyar; Victor A Rosenberg; Antonette T Dulay; Christina S Han; Erika F Werner; Stephen Thung; Catalin S Buhimschi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Use of likelihood ratios for comparisons of binary diagnostic tests: underlying ROC curves.

Authors:  Andriy I Bandos; Howard E Rockette; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A benchmark driven guide to binding site comparison: An exhaustive evaluation using tailor-made data sets (ProSPECCTs).

Authors:  Christiane Ehrt; Tobias Brinkjost; Oliver Koch
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Comparison of nine phenotypic methods for detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production by Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Hélène Garrec; Laurence Drieux-Rouzet; Jean-Louis Golmard; Vincent Jarlier; Jérôme Robert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Defining optimal cutoff value of MGMT promoter methylation by ROC analysis for clinical setting in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Guoqiang Yuan; Liang Niu; Yinian Zhang; Xiaoqing Wang; Kejun Ma; Hang Yin; Junqiang Dai; Wangning Zhou; Yawen Pan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  ICP and CPP: excellent predictors of long term outcome in severely brain injured children.

Authors:  B G Carter; W Butt; A Taylor
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 9.  Development of diagnostic criteria for psoriatic arthritis: methods and process.

Authors:  William J Taylor; Philip S Helliwell
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  Evaluating sleepiness-related daytime function by querying wakefulness inability and fatigue: Sleepiness-Wakefulness Inability and Fatigue Test (SWIFT).

Authors:  R Bart Sangal
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.