Literature DB >> 10699903

Primary treatment choices for men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma detected by screening.

Y Yan1, G F Carvalhal, W J Catalona, J D Young.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, prostate carcinoma is diagnosed through screening. However, little is known regarding factors that influence a patient's decision concerning the treatment choices presented to him.
METHODS: Subjects were prostate carcinoma patients detected through the Washington University PSA Prostate Cancer Screening Program between September 1989 and June 1998. The sources of data were the prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening database and follow-up questionnaire.
RESULTS: Among 1809 study subjects, 79.2% chose radical prostatectomy (RP), 12.4% chose radiation therapy, and 8.4% chose watchful waiting (WW) as their decision regarding primary treatment. In bivariate analyses, education, income, age, indication for prostate biopsy, comorbidity score, serum PSA level, clinical stage, and pretreatment urinary and sexual function were associated significantly with treatment choice, but race, marital status, and Gleason grade were not. In a multivariate analysis, age, race, clinical stage, PSA level, and pretreatment urinary and sexual function were found to be associated significantly with treatment choice. For every 5-year decrease in age, the odds for choosing RP versus WW increased by 276%; for every 1-ng increase in PSA, the odds for choosing RP versus WW increased by 12%. Non-African-American patients were greater than four times more likely to select RP versus WW. Patients with T2 tumors and those with normal pretreatment urinary function were three times more likely and twice more likely to choose RP versus WW, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, RP was the most widely used treatment in patients with screen-detected prostate carcinoma. Age, race, PSA level, clinical stage, and pretreatment urinary and sexual function were significant factors influencing treatment selection. Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10699903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  18 in total

1.  [Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in elderly patients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes].

Authors:  D Porres; D Pfister; A P Labanaris; V Zugor; J H Witt; A Heidenreich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  The incremental value of contrast-enhanced MRI in the detection of biopsy-proven local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: effect of reader experience.

Authors:  Cecilia Wassberg; Oguz Akin; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Amita Shukla-Dave; Jingbo Zhang; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Impact of age at diagnosis on prostate cancer treatment and survival.

Authors:  Seth K Bechis; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Survival after radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Claudio Jeldres; Nazareno Suardi; Paul Perrotte; Umberto Capitanio; Jochen Walz; Georg C Hutterer; Fred Saad; Luc Valiquette; Markus Graefen; Hugues Widmer; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Prostate cancer in elderly men.

Authors:  Anton Stangelberger; Matthias Waldert; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

6.  Risk of hospitalisation after primary treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Zhigang Duan; Karim Chamie; Karen E Hoffman; Benjamin D Smith; Jim C Hu; Jay B Shah; John W Davis; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Personality predicts prostate cancer treatment decision-making difficulty and satisfaction.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Louis A Penner; Brady T West; Tracy M Downs; Walter Rayford; Willie Underwood
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Five-year nationwide follow-up study of active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Yasin Folkvaljon; Danil V Makarov; Ola Bratt; Anna Bill-Axelson; Pär Stattin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  [Therapy choices of German urologists and radio-oncologists if personally diagnosed with localized prostate cancer].

Authors:  R Gillitzer; C Hampel; C Thomas; F Schmidt; S W Melchior; S Pahernik; H Schmidberger; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Low-dose rate brachytherapy of the prostate in elderly patients.

Authors:  C Chiumento; A Fiorentino; R Caivano; S Clemente; V Fusco
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.