Literature DB >> 24993868

Five-year nationwide follow-up study of active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Stacy Loeb1, Yasin Folkvaljon2, Danil V Makarov3, Ola Bratt4, Anna Bill-Axelson5, Pär Stattin6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) is an important yet underutilized strategy to reduce prostate cancer (PCa) overtreatment.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the 5-yr outcomes of AS in a population-based setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden, we identified 11 726 men ≤70 yr diagnosed with very low-risk to intermediate-risk PCa from 2003 to 2007 who completed 5 yr of follow-up. Of these men, 1729 (15%) chose AS for the primary management strategy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We calculated the probability of discontinuation of AS over time, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine factors associated with discontinuation. Reasons for discontinuation were assessed by data extraction from medical charts. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: By 5 yr, 64% of the men remained on AS. Predictors of discontinuation were younger age, fewer comorbidities, more education, higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and clinical stage T2 disease; marital status did not predict discontinuation. In a subset with data on the reason for discontinuation (86%), 20% of men discontinued because of patient preference, 52% because of PSA progression, 24% because of biopsy progression, and 3% for other reasons.
CONCLUSIONS: In a population-based setting, the majority of men remained on AS at 5 yr. However, one-fifth of the men who discontinued AS did so for nonbiologic reasons. Thus, there is a need for support and counseling for men to continue AS in the absence of signs of progression to improve adherence to AS and decrease overtreatment. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Active surveillance (AS) is an important option to delay or avoid treatment for men with favorable prostate cancer features. This study shows that at 5 yr, 64% of men across an entire population remained on AS. We concluded that AS is a durable option and that counseling may be useful to promote adherence for men without progression.
Copyright © 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Adverse pathology; Predictors; Prostate cancer; Upgrading

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24993868      PMCID: PMC4280355          DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  17 in total

1.  Perception of cancer and inconsistency in medical information are associated with decisional conflict: a pilot study of men with prostate cancer who undergo active surveillance.

Authors:  Alvin C Goh; Marc A Kowalkowski; Donald E Bailey; Meredith W Kazer; Sara J Knight; David M Latini
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Comorbidity, treatment and mortality: a population based cohort study of prostate cancer in PCBaSe Sweden.

Authors:  Anders Berglund; Hans Garmo; Carol Tishelman; Lars Holmberg; Pär Stattin; Mats Lambe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer in a veteran population.

Authors:  Eugene K Lee; Janet Baack; Heidi Penn; Cecil T Bromfield; David A Duchene; J Brantley Thrasher; Jeffrey M Holzbeierlein
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.344

4.  Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Bruce J Trock; Patricia Landis; Zhaoyong Feng; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Marc A Dall'Era; Peter C Albertsen; Christopher Bangma; Peter R Carroll; H Ballentine Carter; Matthew R Cooperberg; Stephen J Freedland; Laurence H Klotz; Christopher Parker; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Active surveillance in men with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Issa J Dahabreh; Mei Chung; Ethan M Balk; Winifred W Yu; Paul Mathew; Joseph Lau; Stanley Ip
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference: role of active surveillance in the management of men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz; John M Barry; Wylie Burke; Nananda F Col; Phaedra S Corso; Everett Dodson; M Elizabeth Hammond; Barry A Kogan; Charles F Lynch; Lee Newcomer; Eric J Seifter; Janet A Tooze; Kasisomayajula Viswanath; Hunter Wessells
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Outcome following active surveillance of men with screen-detected prostate cancer. Results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman; Erik Holmberg; Ali Khatami; Johan Stranne; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Patterns of care for men diagnosed with prostate cancer in Victoria from 2008 to 2011.

Authors:  Sue M Evans; Jeremy L Millar; Ian D Davis; Declan G Murphy; Damien M Bolton; Graham G Giles; Mark Frydenberg; Nick Andrianopoulos; Julie M Wood; Albert G Frauman; Anthony J Costello; John J McNeil
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Cohort Profile: the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden and Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden 2.0.

Authors:  Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Annette Wigertz; Fredrik Sandin; Hans Garmo; Karin Hellström; Per Fransson; Anders Widmark; Mats Lambe; Jan Adolfsson; Eberhard Varenhorst; Jan-Erik Johansson; Pär Stattin
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  29 in total

1.  The uptake of active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer: A population-based analysis.

Authors:  Patrick O Richard; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Tony Panzarella; Laurence Klotz; Maria Komisarenko; Neil E Fleshner; David Urbach; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Active surveillance in Canadian men with low-grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Octav Cristea; Luke T Lavallée; Joshua Montroy; Andrew Stokl; Sonya Cnossen; Ranjeeta Mallick; Dean Fergusson; Franco Momoli; Illias Cagiannos; Christopher Morash; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Improved decision making in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a multicenter study on pathologic and oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jean Baptiste Beauval; Guillaume Ploussard; Bastien Cabarrou; Mathieu Roumiguié; Adil Ouzzane; Jérome Gas; Annabelle Goujon; Gautier Marcq; Romain Mathieu; Sébastien Vincendeau; Xavier Cathelineau; Pierre Mongiat-Artus; Laurent Salomon; Michel Soulié; Arnaud Méjean; Alexandre de La Taille; Morgan Rouprêt; François Rozet
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Making a case "for" focal therapy of the prostate in intermediate risk prostate cancer: current perspective and ongoing trials.

Authors:  Alex Z Wang; Amir H Lebastchi; Luke P O'Connor; Michael Ahdoot; Sherif Mehralivand; Nitin Yerram; Samir S Taneja; Arvin K George; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; John F Ward; Pilar Laguna; Jean de la Rosette; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  HAROW: the first comprehensive prospective observational study comparing treatment options in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lothar Weissbach; Steffen Stuerzebecher; Eberhard Mumperow; Theodor Klotz; Dietrich Schnell
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Factors Influencing Men's Choice of and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Mixed-method Systematic Review.

Authors:  Netty Kinsella; Pär Stattin; Declan Cahill; Christian Brown; Anna Bill-Axelson; Ola Bratt; Sigrid Carlsson; Mieke Van Hemelrijck
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Steering Committee: PI-RADS v2 Status Update and Future Directions.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Jeffrey Weinreb; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Geert Villeirs; Baris Turkbey; Jelle Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Analysis of active surveillance uptake for low-risk localized prostate cancer in Canada: a Canadian multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Narhari Timilshina; Veronique Ouellet; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Nathalie Delvoye; Darrel Drachenberg; Antonio Finelli; Marie-Paule Jammal; Pierre Karakiewicz; Hélène Lapointe; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Kenny Lynch; Jean-Benoît Paradis; Paula Sitarik; Alan So; Fred Saad
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  The Influence of Psychosocial Constructs on the Adherence to Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer in a Prospective, Population-based Cohort.

Authors:  Maximilian F Lang; Mark D Tyson; JoAnn Rudd Alvarez; Tatsuki Koyama; Karen E Hoffman; Matthew J Resnick; Matthew R Cooperberg; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Vivien Chen; Lisa E Paddock; Ann S Hamilton; Mia Hashibe; Michael Goodman; Sheldon Greenfield; Sherrie H Kaplan; Antoinette Stroup; David F Penson; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Immediate versus delayed prostatectomy: Nationwide population-based study (.).

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Yasin Folkvaljon; David Robinson; Danil V Makarov; Ola Bratt; Hans Garmo; Pär Stattin
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 1.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.