Literature DB >> 10699759

Common pathways for ultraviolet skin carcinogenesis in the repair and replication defective groups of xeroderma pigmentosum.

J E Cleaver1.   

Abstract

The human disease xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) involves DNA repair and replication deficiencies that predispose homozygous individuals to a 1000-fold increase in nonmelanoma and melanoma skin cancers. Two major forms of XP are known with different biochemical defects: one form lacks nucleotide excision repair (NER); the other lacks the capacity to replicate damaged DNA. Since the clinical symptoms of both kinds of patients are almost the same, the different cellular defects must be reconciled with common clinical outcomes. An additional question among the NER defective patients is how to reconcile widely different skin and central nervous system symptoms with mutations in the same biochemical pathway. XP involves seven genes of the NER system (XPA through G). The XPA gene codes for a protein that is central to NER and binds to a variety of UV light and chemical damage to DNA. It also acts as a nucleation center for other repair proteins to attach and carry out excision and replacement synthesis. Mutations in XPA that are within the DNA binding site produce more severe CNS disorders, than mutations in the C-terminal region of the protein that interacts with the TFIIH complex. In contrast, mutations in two members of the TFIIH complex, the XPB and XPD genes are generally very severe with both skin and CNS disorders. Missense mutations within the helicase regions of these genes are associated with DNA repair deficiencies and XPD; mutations elsewhere in these genes are correlated with symptoms of XP and Cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy. This raises the question whether the CNS disorders of XPA, XPB, and XPD patients are similar, or whether a careful clinical evaluation might reveal different mechanisms of development. The XP variant lacks the capacity to replicate damaged DNA due to mutations in hRad30, a damage-specific polymerase eta. The phenotype of XP variant cells becomes unstable and the cells become much more UV-sensitive when they are transformed by methods that inactivate p53. On a p53 negative background, the induction of recombination between sister chromatids occurs much more extensively than in normal cells, and we have evidence that DNA double strand breaks which trigger an apoptotic pathway involving caspase-3 are involved. The pathway for UV carcinogenesis may be the same for all XP patients if the ultimate cause of genomic instability is an increase in replication of damaged DNA by the error-prone polymerase zeta. The presence of unrepaired damage in the NER defective groups of XP would present more substrate for the error-prone system leading to increased mutation rates. The absence of pol eta would require cells to use the error-prone pol zeta pathway, also increasing mutation rates from UV damage. A common pathway for increased mutagenesis therefore underlies both forms of XP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10699759     DOI: 10.1016/s0923-1811(99)00088-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dermatol Sci        ISSN: 0923-1811            Impact factor:   4.563


  47 in total

1.  Regulation and disregulation of mammalian nucleotide excision repair: a pathway to nongermline breast carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Jean J Latimer; Vongai J Majekwana; Yashira R Pabón-Padín; Manasi R Pimpley; Stephen G Grant
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.421

2.  Association between the XPG gene rs2094258 polymorphism and risk of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Jiefeng Yin; Qi Xu; Jianfeng Shi
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 3.  The SAGA continues: expanding the cellular role of a transcriptional co-activator complex.

Authors:  S P Baker; P A Grant
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Structural insights into the recognition of cisplatin and AAF-dG lesion by Rad14 (XPA).

Authors:  Sandra C Koch; Jochen Kuper; Karola L Gasteiger; Nina Simon; Ralf Strasser; David Eisen; Simon Geiger; Sabine Schneider; Caroline Kisker; Thomas Carell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Development of cancer-initiating cells and immortalized cells with genomic instability.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Yoshioka; Yuko Atsumi; Hitoshi Nakagama; Hirobumi Teraoka
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 5.326

6.  Polymorphisms in the XPG gene and risk of gastric cancer in Chinese populations.

Authors:  Jing He; Li-Xin Qiu; Meng-Yun Wang; Rui-Xi Hua; Ruo-Xin Zhang; Hong-Ping Yu; Ya-Nong Wang; Meng-Hong Sun; Xiao-Yan Zhou; Ya-Jun Yang; Jiu-Cun Wang; Li Jin; Qing-Yi Wei; Jin Li
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Skin microbiota-host interactions.

Authors:  Y Erin Chen; Michael A Fischbach; Yasmine Belkaid
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Surgical Excision with Rotational Flap Reconstruction for Basosquamous Cell Carcinoma in Xeroderma Pigmentosa: A Case Report.

Authors:  Sharanabasappa Rudragouda Malipatil; Sriharsha Vijay Jonnalagadda
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-10-03

9.  XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism and esophageal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.

Authors:  Da-Peng Ding; Wen-Li Ma; Xiao-Feng He; Ying Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 2.316

10.  DNA repair and transcriptional effects of mutations in TFIIH in Drosophila development.

Authors:  Carlos Merino; Enrique Reynaud; Martha Vázquez; Mario Zurita
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.