Literature DB >> 10699099

Pediatricians' attitudes, beliefs, and practices regarding clinical practice guidelines: a national survey.

G Flores1, M Lee, H Bauchner, B Kastner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines are increasingly being used for a wide variety of medical conditions, but not enough is known about physicians' attitudes and beliefs about guidelines, how often and under what circumstances they are used, and factors associated with their acceptance.
OBJECTIVE: To determine practice guideline attitudes, beliefs, practices, and factors associated with use among a representative national sample of general pediatricians. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional mail survey.
SUBJECTS: Random sample of general pediatrician members of the American Academy of Pediatrics residing in all 50 states and Puerto Rico. SURVEY INSTRUMENT: Twenty-four multiple-choice, Likert scale, yes-no, and open-ended questions about pediatric clinical practice guidelines.
RESULTS: From 1088 respondents, 461 specialists were excluded; the remaining 627 general pediatricians were mostly male (61%), white (81%), and in group practice (62%) in a suburban location (48%). Practice guidelines are used by 35% of pediatricians, in part by 44%, and not at all by 21%. Over 100 different practice guidelines are used, most commonly for asthma (77%), hyperbilirubinemia (27%), and otitis media (19%). Common reasons for use of practice guidelines include standardization of care (17%) and helpfulness (10%). Commonly cited problems with practice guidelines include failure to allow for clinical judgment (54%), use in litigation (16%), and limitation of autonomy (5%). In multivariate analysis, the odds of practice guideline use were greater among pediatricians in health maintenance organization practices (odds ratio [OR]: 9.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-68.0) and those who were nonwhite (OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1-4.8), but lower in those with more weekly patient visits (OR:.7; 95% CI:.5-.9). Features most likely to lead to practice guideline use include simplicity (16%), feasibility (12%), and evidence of improved outcomes (10%). Most pediatricians agree that practice guidelines improve outcomes (89%), are motivated by a desire to improve quality (94%), and should not be used in litigation (82%) or disciplinary actions (77%), nor be motivated by a desire to reduce costs (73%).
CONCLUSIONS: Most general pediatricians use practice guidelines, but no specific guidelines, except those for asthma, are used by >27% of pediatricians. The results of this study suggest that practice guidelines are most likely to be followed if they are simple, flexible, rigorously tested, not used punitively, and are motivated by desires to improve quality, not reduce costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10699099     DOI: 10.1542/peds.105.3.496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  44 in total

Review 1.  Practice guidelines and measurement: state-of-the-science.

Authors:  Patricia C Dykes
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Regional differences in symptomatic fever management among paediatricians in Switzerland: the results of a cross-sectional Web-based survey.

Authors:  Sebastiano A G Lava; Giacomo D Simonetti; Alessandra Ferrarini; Gian Paolo Ramelli; Mario G Bianchetti
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Clinical practice guidelines: what they are, why we need them and how they should be developed through rigorous evaluation.

Authors:  Cristina Cecamore; Alessandra Savino; Roberta Salvatore; Alessandro Cafarotti; Piernicola Pelliccia; Angelika Mohn; Francesco Chiarelli
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Disparities in asthma medication dispensing patterns: the case of pediatric asthma in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Doryliz Vila; Cynthia S Rand; Michael D Cabana; Amarilis Quiñones; Mirla Otero; Christina Gamache; Rafael Ramírez; Pedro García; Glorisa Canino
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.515

5.  Predictors of the growing influence of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Ann S O'malley; Hoangmai H Pham; James D Reschovsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Attitudes toward practice guidelines among intensive care unit personnel: a cross-sectional anonymous survey.

Authors:  Dave Quiros; Susan Lin; Elaine L Larson
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.210

7.  Standardized Clinical Assessment And Management Plans (SCAMPs) provide a better alternative to clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Michael Farias; Kathy Jenkins; James Lock; Rahul Rathod; Jane Newburger; David W Bates; Dana G Safran; Kevin Friedman; Josh Greenberg
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of childhood overweight and obesity.

Authors:  Mario Delgado-Noguera; Sera Tort; Xavier Bonfill; Ignasi Gich; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  Addressing asthma health disparities: a multilevel challenge.

Authors:  Glorisa Canino; Elizabeth L McQuaid; Cynthia S Rand
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 10.793

10.  A comprehensive model of factors affecting adoption of clinical practice guidelines in Korea.

Authors:  Yang-Kyun Kim; Sun-Hee Lee; Ju-Hyun Seo; Ju-Hye Kim; Seong-Deok Kim; Gook-Ki Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.