Literature DB >> 23650325

Standardized Clinical Assessment And Management Plans (SCAMPs) provide a better alternative to clinical practice guidelines.

Michael Farias1, Kathy Jenkins, James Lock, Rahul Rathod, Jane Newburger, David W Bates, Dana G Safran, Kevin Friedman, Josh Greenberg.   

Abstract

Variability in medical practice in the United States leads to higher costs without achieving better patient outcomes. Clinical practice guidelines, which are intended to reduce variation and improve care, have several drawbacks that limit the extent of buy-in by clinicians. In contrast, standardized clinical assessment and management plans (SCAMPs) offer a clinician-designed approach to promoting care standardization that accommodates patients' individual differences, respects providers' clinical acumen, and keeps pace with the rapid growth of medical knowledge. Since early 2009 more than 12,000 patients have been enrolled in forty-nine SCAMPs in nine states and Washington, D.C. In one example, a SCAMP was credited with increasing clinicians' rate of compliance with a recommended specialist referral for children from 19.6 percent to 75 percent. In another example, SCAMPs were associated with an 11-51 percent decrease in total medical expenses for six conditions when compared with a historical cohort. Innovative tools such as SCAMPs should be carefully examined by policy makers searching for methods to promote the delivery of high-quality, cost-effective care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children’s Health; Evidence-Based Medicine; Health Reform; Organization And Delivery Of Care; Variations

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23650325      PMCID: PMC3990928          DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  20 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated?

Authors:  P G Shekelle; E Ortiz; S Rhodes; S C Morton; M P Eccles; J M Grimshaw; S H Woolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Dynamic evolution of practice guidelines: analysis of deviations from assessment and management plans.

Authors:  Michael Farias; Kevin G Friedman; Andrew J Powell; Sarah D de Ferranti; Audrey C Marshall; David W Brown; Thomas J Kulik
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Margaret Sampson; Mohammed T Ansari; Jun Ji; Steve Doucette; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Influence of industry on renal guideline development.

Authors:  Daniel W Coyne
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 6.  To close or not to close: the very small patent ductus arteriosus.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Fortescue; James E Lock; Teresa Galvin; Doff B McElhinney
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.007

7.  Clinical practice guidelines: a tool to improve care.

Authors:  W G Carnett
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 0.926

8.  Slowing the growth of health care costs--lessons from regional variation.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; Julie P Bynum; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review.

Authors:  Susan L Norris; Haley K Holmer; Lauren A Ogden; Brittany U Burda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Resource Utilization Reduction for Evaluation of Chest Pain in Pediatrics Using a Novel Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plan (SCAMP).

Authors:  George R Verghese; Kevin G Friedman; Rahul H Rathod; Amir Meiri; Susan F Saleeb; Dionne A Graham; Robert L Geggel; David R Fulton
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Implementing quality measures for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Shahzad Ahmed; Corey A Siegel; Gil Y Melmed
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-04

2.  Orthopaedic healthcare worldwide: standardized clinical assessment and management plans: an adjunct to clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Apurva S Shah; Peter M Waters; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Knowledge as a Service at the Point of Care.

Authors:  Jane L Shellum; Robert R Freimuth; Steve G Peters; Rick A Nishimura; Rajeev Chaudhry; Steve J Demuth; Amy L Knopp; Timothy A Miksch; Dawn S Milliner
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

4.  Implementation of a Risk Stratification and Management Pathway for Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Christopher W Baugh; Jeffrey O Greenberg; Simon A Mahler; Joshua M Kosowsky; Jeremiah D Schuur; Siddharth Parmar; George R Ciociolo; Christina W Carr; Roya Ghazinouri; Benjamin M Scirica
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2016-12

5.  Gathering and learning from relevant clinical data: a new framework.

Authors:  Michael Farias; Kevin G Friedman; James E Lock; Rahul H Rathod
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Introducing Choosing Wisely®: Next steps in improving healthcare value.

Authors:  Leora I Horwitz; Andrew L Masica; Andrew D Auerbach
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.960

7.  Carotid Endarterectomy in the Southern California Vascular Outcomes Improvement Collaborative.

Authors:  Kaelan Chan; Ahmed Abouzamzam; Karen Woo
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 1.466

Review 8.  Epidemiology, outcomes, and management of acute kidney injury in the vascular surgery patient.

Authors:  Charles Hobson; Nicholas Lysak; Matthew Huber; Salvatore Scali; Azra Bihorac
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 9.  D-transposition of the great arteries: the current era of the arterial switch operation.

Authors:  Juan Villafañe; M Regina Lantin-Hermoso; Ami B Bhatt; James S Tweddell; Tal Geva; Meena Nathan; Martin J Elliott; Victoria L Vetter; Stephen M Paridon; Lazaros Kochilas; Kathy J Jenkins; Robert H Beekman; Gil Wernovsky; Jeffrey A Towbin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Perioperative Acute Kidney Injury: Risk Factors and Predictive Strategies.

Authors:  Charles Hobson; Rupam Ruchi; Azra Bihorac
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.