Literature DB >> 10699024

Comparison of two commercial methods for measurement of cytomegalovirus load in blood samples after renal transplantation.

C Y Tong1, L E Cuevas, H Williams, A Bakran.   

Abstract

A cohort of 77 renal transplant recipients was prospectively studied for comparison of two commercially available cytomegalovirus (CMV) load assays, i.e., the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV Monitor test (Amplicor), using plasma samples, and the Murex Hybrid Capture System (HCS), using whole blood. The manufacturer of the HCS assay changed the version of the test from 1.0 (HCS-1) to 2.0 (HCS-2) after the first 37 patients had been tested. Despite the differences in principle and type of specimen used, the Amplicor and HCS assays gave comparable results. The regression line correlating the HCS-1 assay to the Amplicor assay was similar to that correlating the HCS-2 assay to the Amplicor assay. The HCS results could be converted to Amplicor-equivalent units by using linear-regression equations [log(10) HCS-1 result = 0.49 (log(10) Amplicor result) + 2.58, and log(10) HCS-2 result = 0.61 (log(10) Amplicor result) + 2.18]. The HCS-2 assay appeared to have the lowest detection limit, followed by the Amplicor assay and then the HCS-1 assay. When a sliding scale of cutoff values in Amplicor-equivalent units (>1,000, >2,500, >6,000, >16,000, >40,000, and >100,000 copies/ml) was applied to diagnose CMV disease, similar patterns of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were observed with the Amplicor and HCS assays. A cutoff value of >40,000 copies/ml has a low sensitivity (Amplicor, 29.4%; HCS, 41.2%) but is specific (Amplicor, 96.7%; HCS, 93.3%) and can be used for the differential diagnosis of CMV disease (PPV, 71.4% [Amplicor] or 63. 6% [HCS]; NPV, 82.9% [Amplicor] or 84.8% [HCS]). A lower cutoff value of >1,000 copies/ml improves the sensitivity (Amplicor, 76.5%; HCS, 82.4%) and has a high NPV (Amplicor, 91.8%; HCS, 94.2%) but, due to the low PPV (Amplicor, 46.2%; HCS, 56%), is useful only for exclusion of CMV disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10699024      PMCID: PMC86379     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  15 in total

1.  Clinical significance of viral load in the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus disease after liver transplantation.

Authors:  J Mendez; M Espy; T F Smith; J Wilson; R Wiesner; C V Paya
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  A three-center European external quality control study of PCR for detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in blood.

Authors:  J E Grundy; A Ehrnst; H Einsele; V C Emery; H Hebart; H G Prentice; P Ljungman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Infections in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  R Patel; C V Paya
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Quantity of cytomegalovirus viruria is a major risk factor for cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation.

Authors:  A V Cope; P Sweny; C Sabin; L Rees; P D Griffiths; V C Emery
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.327

5.  Usefulness of DNA viral load quantification for cytomegalovirus disease monitoring in renal and pancreas/renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  B M Imbert-Marcille; D Cantarovich; V Ferre-Aubineau; B Richet; J P Soulillou; S Billaudel
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Prospective study utilizing a quantitative polymerase chain reaction for detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in the blood of renal transplant patients.

Authors:  J C Gerdes; E K Spees; K Fitting; J Hiraki; M Sheehan; D Duda; T Jarvi; C Roehl; A D Robertson
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.066

7.  Cytomegalovirus excretion as a predictor of cytomegalovirus disease after marrow transplantation: importance of cytomegalovirus viremia.

Authors:  J D Meyers; P Ljungman; L D Fisher
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Correlation of cytomegalovirus DNA levels with response to antiviral therapy in cardiac and renal allograft recipients.

Authors:  M Toyoda; J B Carlos; O A Galera; K Galfayan; X Zhang; Z Sun; L S Czer; S C Jordan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Monitoring of renal allograft recipients by quantitation of human cytomegalovirus genomes in peripheral blood leukocytes.

Authors:  J E Kühn; T Wendland; P Schäfer; K Möhring; U Wieland; M Elgas; H J Eggers
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.327

10.  Comparative quantitation of human cytomegalovirus DNA in blood leukocytes and plasma of transplant and AIDS patients.

Authors:  G Gerna; M Furione; F Baldanti; A Sarasini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparison of three nucleic acid amplification assays of cerebrospinal fluid for diagnosis of cytomegalovirus encephalitis.

Authors:  A Bestetti; C Pierotti; M Terreni; A Zappa; L Vago; A Lazzarin; P Cinque
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of DNA amplification, mRNA amplification, and DNA hybridization techniques for detection of cytomegalovirus in bone marrow transplant recipients.

Authors:  Francisco Diaz-Mitoma; Chantal Leger; Helen Miller; Antonio Giulivi; Rita Frost; Laura Shaw; Lothar Huebsch
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of molecular tests for detection and quantification of cell-associated cytomegalovirus DNA.

Authors:  Angela M Caliendo; Belinda Yen-Lieberman; Jovana Baptista; Janet Andersen; Clyde Crumpacker; Rob Schuurman; Stephen A Spector; James Bremer; Nell S Lurain
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Predictive value of quantitative PCR-based viral burden analysis for eight human herpesviruses in pediatric solid organ transplant patients.

Authors:  X Bai; B B Rogers; P C Harkins; J Sommerauer; R Squires; K Rotondo; A Quan; D B Dawson; R H Scheuermann
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Evaluation of the ReSSQ assay in relation to the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR test and an in-house nested PCR method for detection of cytomegalovirus DNA.

Authors:  Benita Zweygberg Wirgart; Pia Andersson; Lena Grillner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Normalized quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA by competitive real-time PCR on the LightCycler instrument.

Authors:  Markus Stöcher; Jörg Berg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Monitoring of viral load by quantitative plasma PCR during active cytomegalovirus infection of individual liver transplant patients.

Authors:  Heli Piiparinen; Krister Höckerstedt; Maija Lappalainen; Jukka Suni; Irmeli Lautenschlager
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Automated extraction and quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA in whole blood by real-time PCR assay.

Authors:  C Mengelle; K Sandres-Sauné; C Pasquier; L Rostaing; J-M Mansuy; M Marty; I Da Silva; M Attal; P Massip; J Izopet
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  CMV infection of liver transplant recipients: comparison of antigenemia and molecular biology assays.

Authors:  M L Amorim; J M Cabeda; R Seca; A C Mendes; A P Castro; J M Amorim
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2001-05-22       Impact factor: 3.090

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.