Literature DB >> 10698243

The impact of computer-generated messages on childhood immunization coverage.

E F Dini1, R W Linkins, J Sigafoos.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent evaluations of computer-generated reminder/recall messages have suggested that they are an inexpensive, labor-saving method of improving office visitation rates of childhood immunization providers. This study assesses the sustained impact of computer-generated messages on immunization coverage during the first two years of life.
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: County health department in the Denver metropolitan area. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Children (n = 1227) 60 to 90 days of age who had received the first dose of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) and/or poliovirus vaccines. INTERVENTION: Households of children were randomized into four groups to receive: telephone messages followed by letters (Group A); telephone messages alone (Group B); letters only (Group C); or no notification (Group D). Households in the intervention groups (A, B, and C) received up to five computer-generated telephone messages and/or up to four letters each time their children became due for immunization(s). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Immunization series completion at 24 months of age.
RESULTS: Children whose families were randomized to receive any of the interventions were 21% more likely to have completed the immunization series by 24 months of age than were children randomized into the control group (49.2% vs 40.9%; RR [rate ratio] = .21; CI [confidence interval] = 1.01, 1.44). While not statistically significant, children in Group A were 23% more likely to complete their immunization series by 24 months of age than those in the control group (50.2% vs 40.9%; RR = 1.23; CI = 1.00, 1.52). No differences were detected among the intervention groups. The costs per additional child completing the series by 24 months of age in Group A was $226 ($79 after start-up costs were discounted).
CONCLUSION: Computer-generated contacts, either by phone or by mail (or both combined), used each time vaccines become due, are efficacious in increasing immunization coverage of children under 2 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10698243     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00086-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  15 in total

1.  The regional immunization registry as a public health tool for improving clinical practice and guiding immunization delivery policy.

Authors:  Allison Kempe; Brenda L Beaty; John F Steiner; Kellyn A Pearson; N Elaine Lowery; Matthew F Daley; Lori A Crane; Stephen Berman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Design and development of a Telephone-Linked Care (TLC) system to reduce impulsivity among violent forensic outpatients and probationers.

Authors:  Anne H Berman; Ramesh Farzanfar; Marianne Kristiansson; Per Carlbring; Robert H Friedman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  Interventions to increase pediatric vaccine uptake: An overview of recent findings.

Authors:  Paula M Frew; Chelsea S Lutz
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Sara Cooper; Bey-Marrié Schmidt; Evanson Z Sambala; Alison Swartz; Christopher J Colvin; Natalie Leon; Charles S Wiysonge
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-27

Review 5.  Systematic review of the incremental costs of interventions that increase immunization coverage.

Authors:  Sachiko Ozawa; Tatenda T Yemeke; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  Increasing Coverage of Appropriate Vaccinations: A Community Guide Systematic Economic Review.

Authors:  Verughese Jacob; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; David P Hopkins; Jennifer Murphy Morgan; Adesola A Pitan; John M Clymer
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Acceptability of Reminders for Immunization Appointments via Mobile Devices by Mothers in Ilorin, Nigeria: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Rasheedat Mobolaji Ibraheem; Moshood Adebayo Akintola
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2017-11

8.  How do caregivers know when to take their child for immunizations?

Authors:  Kate M Shaw; Lawrence E Barker
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 9.  Barriers to the use of reminder/recall interventions for immunizations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer A Pereira; Susan Quach; Christine L Heidebrecht; Sherman D Quan; Faron Kolbe; Michael Finkelstein; Jeffrey C Kwong
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates.

Authors:  Julie C Jacobson Vann; Robert M Jacobson; Tamera Coyne-Beasley; Josephine K Asafu-Adjei; Peter G Szilagyi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.