Literature DB >> 10697278

The World Health Organization classification of hematological malignancies report of the Clinical Advisory Committee Meeting, Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997.

N L Harris1, E S Jaffe, J Diebold, G Flandrin, H K Muller-Hermelink, J Vardiman, T A Lister, C D Bloomfield.   

Abstract

Since 1995, the European Association of Pathologists and the Society for Hematopathology have been developing a new World Health Organization (WHO) classification of hematologic malignancies. The classification includes lymphoid, myeloid, histiocytic, and mast cell neoplasms. The WHO project involves 10 committees of pathologists, who have developed lists and definitions of disease entities. A Clinical Advisory Committee of international hematologists and oncologists was formed to ensure that the classification will be useful to clinicians. A meeting was held in November 1997 to discuss clinical issues related to the classification. The WHO has adopted the Revised European-American Classification of Lymphoid Neoplasms, published in 1994 by the International Lymphoma Study Group, as the classification of lymphoid neoplasms. This approach to classification is based on the principle that a classification is a list of "real" disease entities, which are defined by a combination of morphology, immunophenotype, genetic features, and clinical features. The relative importance of each of these features varies among diseases, and there is no one "gold standard." The WHO classification has applied the principles of the Revised European-American Classification of Lymphoid Neoplasms to myeloid and histiocytic neoplasms. The classification of myeloid neoplasms recognizes distinct entities defined by a combination of morphology and cytogenetic abnormalities. The Clinical Advisory Committee meeting, which was organized around a series of clinical questions, was able to reach a consensus on most of the questions posed. The questions and the consensus are discussed in detail in this article. Among other things, the Clinical Advisory Committee concluded that clinical grouping of lymphoid neoplasms was neither necessary nor desirable. Patient treatment is determined by the specific type of lymphoma, with the addition of grade within the tumor type, if applicable, and clinical prognostic factors such as the international prognostic index. The experience of developing the WHO classification has produced a new and exciting degree of cooperation and communication between oncologists and pathologists from around the world. This should facilitate progress in the understanding and treatment of hematologic malignancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10697278     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3880035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  64 in total

Review 1.  Early-stage Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  A Josting; V Diehl
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Distinction between "high grade MALT" and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Mucosa associated lymphoid tissue.

Authors:  S Ely
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Acute myeloid leukemia (FAB-M2) with a masked type of t(8;21) translocation revealed by spectral karyotyping.

Authors:  Jun-ichi Miyagi; Naoki Kakazu; Masato Masuda; Takashi Miyagi; Tamiko Toyohama; Tetsuro Nakazato; Takeaki Tomoyose; Tetsuharu Shinjyo; Akitoshi Nagasaki; Naoya Taira; Misao Ohki; Tatsuo Abe; Nobuyuki Takasu
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  [Mitoxantrone-related acute leukemia by multiple sclerosis. Case report and practical approach by unclear cytopenia].

Authors:  C Meyer; N Ansorge; I Siglienti; S Salmen; A Stroet; H Nückel; U Dührsen; P R Ritter; W E Schmidt; R Gold; A Chan
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  Phase I trial of infusional cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide plus granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Abdissa Negassa; Erick Lansigan; Robin Locke; Chamath R De Silva; Peter H Wiernik
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Parallel gene expression profiling of mantle cell lymphoma - how do we transform 'omics data into clinical practice.

Authors:  Ek Sara; Carl Ak Borrebaeck
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.236

7.  Modulated chemotherapy according to modified comprehensive geriatric assessment in 100 consecutive elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Michele Spina; Monica Balzarotti; Lilj Uziel; Andrés José Marìa Ferreri; Lucia Fratino; Massimo Magagnoli; Renato Talamini; Annalisa Giacalone; Elena Ravaioli; Emanuela Chimienti; Massimiliano Berretta; Arben Lleshi; Armando Santoro; Umberto Tirelli
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-05-18

8.  Results of a Phase II trial of gemcitabine, mitoxantrone, and rituximab in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Lawrence E Garbo; Patrick J Flynn; Margaret A MacRae; Mary A Rauch; Yunfei Wang; Kathryn S Kolibaba
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 9.  Cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma arising in Behçet disease.

Authors:  Yukitaka Katsura; Kazumi Suzukawa; Hiroshi Kojima; Chikashi Yoshida; Seiichi Shimizu; Harumi Mukai; Yuichi Hasegawa; Shigehiko Imagawa; Naoyoshi Mori; Toshiro Nagasawa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.490

10.  microRNA expression profile and identification of miR-29 as a prognostic marker and pathogenetic factor by targeting CDK6 in mantle cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Zhao; Jianhong Lin; Tint Lwin; Hua Yang; Jianping Guo; William Kong; Sophie Dessureault; Lynn C Moscinski; Dorna Rezania; William S Dalton; Eduardo Sotomayor; Jianguo Tao; Jin Q Cheng
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.