Literature DB >> 10697266

Extranodal extension in lymph node-positive prostate cancer.

L Cheng1, T M Pisansky, D M Ramnani, B C Leibovich, J C Cheville, J Slezak, E J Bergstralh, H Zincke, D G Bostwick.   

Abstract

Evaluation of extranodal tumor extension may provide prognostic information for patients with epithelial malignancies. However, its importance for the patient who has prostate cancer with regional lymph node metastasis requires further investigation and clarification. This study was performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of extranodal extension (ENE) in a large series of node-positive patients. The study group included 212 node-positive patients who were treated by bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, radical retropubic prostatectomy, and androgen deprivation between 1987 and 1992 at the Mayo Clinic. ENE was defined as cancer perforating through the lymph node capsule into perinodal tissue. Nodal cancer volume was measured by the grid method. Univariate and multivariate risk ratios (RR) for distant metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival were estimated using the Cox proportional model. The mean follow-up was 6.3 years (median, 6.1 years). Distant metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival at 5 years for all patients was 91% and 95%, respectively. ENE was found in 126 of 212 patients (59%). The presence of ENE was not significantly associated with distant metastasis-free (RR = 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 3.9) or cancer-specific survival (RR = 2.2; 95% CI, 0.7 to 6.8). Among 98 patients with a single positive node, there was no significant difference in distant metastasis or cancer-specific survival according to the presence of ENE (P = .88 and P = .36, respectively). After adjusting for Gleason score, DNA ploidy, and ENE, only nodal cancer volume was significantly associated with adverse distant metastasis-free (RR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.8) and cancer-specific survival (RR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.9). Our data indicate that the presence of ENE is not associated with unfavorable survival in patients with node-positive prostate cancer treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy, bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, and androgen deprivation therapy. In contrast, nodal cancer volume was predictive of distant metastasis-free survival and cancer-specific survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10697266     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3880019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  7 in total

Review 1.  Update on histopathological evaluation of lymphadenectomy specimens from prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Alessandro Conti; Matteo Santoni; Luciano Burattini; Marina Scarpelli; Roberta Mazzucchelli; Andrea B Galosi; Liang Cheng; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  [Diagnostics of radical prostatectomy specimens. Results of the 2009 consensus conference of the International Society of Urological Pathology].

Authors:  G Kristiansen; J R Srigley; B Delahunt; L Egevad
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Re-evaluating the concept of "dominant/index tumor nodule" in multifocal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Cheng Cheng Huang; Fang-Ming Deng; Max X Kong; Qinhu Ren; Jonathan Melamed; Ming Zhou
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Pathological features of lymph node metastasis for predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Laura J Tafe; Daher C Chade; Daniel D Sjoberg; Niccolo Passoni; Shahrokh F Shariat; James Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Samson W Fine; Karim A Touijer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Extranodal extension of lymph node metastasis influences recurrence in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudio Luchini; Achim Fleischmann; Joost L Boormans; Matteo Fassan; Alessia Nottegar; Paola Lucato; Brendon Stubbs; Marco Solmi; Antonio Porcaro; Nicola Veronese; Matteo Brunelli; Aldo Scarpa; Liang Cheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Accuracy of standard clinical 3T prostate MRI for pelvic lymph node staging: Comparison to 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT.

Authors:  Sebastian Meißner; Jan-Carlo Janssen; Vikas Prasad; Gerd Diederichs; Bernd Hamm; Winfried Brenner; Marcus R Makowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Development of a Nomogram to Predict N2 or N3 Stage in T1-2 Invasive Breast Cancer Patients with No Palpable Lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Isaac Kim; Jai Min Ryu; Jae-Myung Kim; Hee Jun Choi; Se Kyung Lee; Jong Hwan Yu; Jeong Eon Lee; Seok Won Kim; Seok Jin Nam
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.588

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.