Literature DB >> 10696893

Learning curve of transrectal ultrasound.

B J Carmody1, D P Otchy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Transrectal ultrasound is the most accurate means of assessing the degree of invasion for rectal neoplasms. A learning curve for performing and interpreting these studies exists, but it is unknown how long or steep it is. We reviewed our initial results with transrectal ultrasound to determine our accuracy and to define the learning curve.
METHODS: All patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound during our initial 30 months of experience were included. Each patient was staged with transrectal ultrasound and, after resection, the histopathologic stage was compared with transrectal ultrasound staging. The accuracy of transrectal ultrasound was calculated at intervals as experience was gained.
RESULTS: A total of 42 examinations were performed on 41 neoplasms in 41 patients. Comparison between transrectal ultrasound and the pathologic stage could be made in 36 studies. Overall accuracy of degree of wall invasion was 78 percent. Overstaging occurred with eight neoplasms, and one lesion was understaged. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasound staging improved with time: 58 percent of the initial 12 studies were staged correctly compared with 87.5 percent accuracy in the remaining 24 examinations (P = 0.048).
CONCLUSION: A definite learning curve was apparent. We conclude that transrectal ultrasound is a relatively simple procedure to learn and, once a moderate degree of experience is gained, should be routinely incorporated into the evaluation of rectal neoplasms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10696893     DOI: 10.1007/bf02236981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  17 in total

1.  Development of a cost-effective system for digital off-line analysis of transrectal ultrasound.

Authors:  R Weidenhagen; T Strauss; K U Gruetzner; F W Spelsberg; H O Steitz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in staging locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation.

Authors:  Zoran Radovanovic; M Breberina; T Petrovic; A Golubovic; D Radovanovic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Is magnetic resonance imaging useful for the management of patients with rectal villous adenoma? A study of 45 consecutive patients treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Authors:  Lucas Raynaud; Diane Mege; Magaly Zappa; Nathalie Guedj; Valérie Vilgrain; Yves Panis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Does a learning curve exist in endorectal two-dimensional ultrasound accuracy?

Authors:  O J Morris; B Draganic; S Smith
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Comparative study of three-dimensional and conventional endorectal ultrasonography used in rectal cancer staging.

Authors:  J C Kim; Y K Cho; S Y Kim; S K Park; M G Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Accuracy of transrectal ultrasound after preoperative radiochemotherapy compared to computed tomography and magnetic resonance in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jacopo Martellucci; M Scheiterle; B Lorenzi; F Roviello; F Cetta; E Pinto; G Tanzini
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The learning curve for endorectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging.

Authors:  Jimmy C M Li; Shirley Y W Liu; Anthony W I Lo; Sophie S F Hon; Simon S M Ng; Janet F Y Lee; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  You get what you expect? A critical appraisal of imaging methodology in endosonographic cancer staging.

Authors:  A Meining; H J Dittler; A Wolf; R Lorenz; V Schusdziarra; J-R Siewert; M Classen; H Höfler; T Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by endorectal ultrasound: is there a learning curve?

Authors:  S A Badger; P B Devlin; P J D Neilly; R Gilliland
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  [Current imaging for rectal cancer].

Authors:  M S Juchems; A J Aschoff
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.