Literature DB >> 10696699

A three-dimensional definition for the flexion/extension and abduction/adduction angles.

P L Cheng1, M Pearcy.   

Abstract

Flexion/extension and abduction/adduction, two major parameters for the description of joint rotations, are used to define planer anatomical orientations of body segments. These two-dimensional definitions have been used extensively in the biomechanical literature for reporting and representing both two-dimensional and three-dimensional joint rotations. Whether these traditional two-dimensional measurements represent true joint rotations in three dimensions has not been investigated. A quantitative error analysis is presented to show how large an error can be produced in the flexion/extension and abduction/adduction angles when using two-dimensional measurements to represent three-dimensional joint rotations. The results indicate that for an out-of-plane flexion the error in abduction angle measured by previous methods increases with both flexion and initial abduction angle and become very sensitive when the flexion angle exceeds 40 degrees. Although the error can be less than 2 degrees for flexion below 20 degrees when the initial abduction angle is at 30 degrees, it can be as large as 9 degrees for 60 degrees of flexion with an initial 10 degrees of abduction; nearly double the real abduction angle. Therefore, two-dimensional measurements of flexion/extension and abduction/adduction can be erroneous and overestimated for a three-dimensional joint rotation. To overcome the problem new definitions are proposed for the true flexion/extension and abduction/adduction angles as two independent parameters for three-dimensional joint rotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10696699     DOI: 10.1007/bf02513327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  4 in total

1.  WALKING PATTERNS OF NORMAL MEN.

Authors:  M P MURRAY; A B DROUGHT; R C KORY
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait.

Authors:  M P Kadaba; H K Ramakrishnan; M E Wootten; J Gainey; G Gorton; G V Cochran
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Anthropomorphic robotics. I. Representing mechanical complexity.

Authors:  M Benati; S Gaglio; P Morasso; V Tagliasco; R Zaccaria
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Dynamic back movement measured using a three-dimensional television system.

Authors:  M J Pearcy; J M Gill; M W Whittle; G R Johnson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Validity and test-retest reliability of manual goniometers for measuring passive hip range of motion in femoroacetabular impingement patients.

Authors:  Silvio Nussbaumer; Michael Leunig; Julia F Glatthorn; Simone Stauffacher; Hans Gerber; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Measurement of three-joint-finger motions: reality or fancy? A three-dimensional anatomical approach.

Authors:  R Degeorges; C Oberlin
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Ergonomic evaluation of biomechanical hand function.

Authors:  Kyung-Sun Lee; Myung-Chul Jung
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2014-09-22

4.  A Nonproprietary Movement Analysis System (MoJoXlab) Based on Wearable Inertial Measurement Units Applicable to Healthy Participants and Those With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Across a Range of Complex Tasks: Validation Study.

Authors:  Riasat Islam; Mohamed Bennasar; Kevin Nicholas; Kate Button; Simon Holland; Paul Mulholland; Blaine Price; Mohammad Al-Amri
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.773

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.