Literature DB >> 10696619

Control of rapid aimed hand movements: the one-target advantage.

J J Adam1, J H Nieuwenstein, R Huys, F G Paas, H Kingma, P Willems, M Werry.   

Abstract

A series of 8 experiments examined the phenomenon that a rapid aimed hand movement is executed faster when it is performed as a single, isolated movement than when it is followed by a second movement (the 1-target advantage). Three new accounts of this effect are proposed and tested: the eye movement hypothesis, the target uncertainty hypothesis, and the movement integration hypothesis. Data are reported that corroborate the 3rd hypothesis, but not the first 2 hypotheses. According to the movement integration hypothesis, the first movement in a series is slowed because control of the second movement may overlap with execution of the first. It is shown that manipulations of target size and movement direction mediate this process and determine the presence and absence of the 1-target advantage. Possible neurophysiological mechanisms and implications for motor control theory are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10696619     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.1.295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  20 in total

1.  Discrete and cyclical units of action in a mixed target pair aiming task.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Jin-H Park; Young U Ryu; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Planning short pointing sequences.

Authors:  Philippe Vindras; Paolo Viviani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Influence of biomechanical factors on substructure of pointing movements.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia; Deric Wisleder; Travis Johnson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The preparation and control of reversal movements as a single unit of action.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Luc Tremblay; Darian T Cheng; Marlene Luis; Stuart J Mourton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Response preparation changes during practice of an asynchronous bimanual movement.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Flexibility in the control of rapid aiming actions.

Authors:  John J Buchanan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The context dependence of grasping movements: an evaluation of possible reasons.

Authors:  Fabian Steinberg; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Pause time alters the preparation of two-component movements.

Authors:  Michael C Bajema; Colum D MacKinnon; Michael J Carter; Michael Kennefick; Sam Perlmutter; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Tailoring reach-to-grasp to intended action: the role of motor practice.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Fitts' law is not continuous in reciprocal aiming.

Authors:  Raoul Huys; Laure Fernandez; Reinoud J Bootsma; Viktor K Jirsa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.