Literature DB >> 10694132

Quadriceps EMG/force relationship in knee extension and leg press.

B A Alkner1, P A Tesch, H E Berg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the relationship between surface electromyographic (EMG) activity and isometric force of m. quadriceps femoris (QF) in the single-joint knee extension (KE) and the multi-joint leg press (LP) exercises.
METHODS: Nine healthy men performed unilateral actions at a knee angle of 90 degrees at 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). EMG was measured from m. vastus lateralis (VL), m. vastus medialis (VM), m. rectus femoris (RF), and m. biceps femoris (BF).
RESULTS: There were no differences in maximum EMG activity of individual muscles between KE and LP. The QF EMG/force relationship was nonlinear in each exercise modality. VL showed no deviation from linearity in neither exercise, whereas VM and RF did. BF activity increased linearly with increased loads.
CONCLUSIONS: The EMG/force relationship of all quadricep muscles studied appears to be similar in isometric multi-joint LP and single-joint KE actions at a knee angle of 90 degrees. This would indicate the strategy of reciprocal force increment among muscles involved is comparable in the two models. Furthermore, these data suggest a nonuniform recruitment pattern among the three superficial QF muscles and surface EMG recordings from VL to be most reliable in predicting force output.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10694132     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200002000-00030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  59 in total

1.  The effectiveness of resistance training using unstable surfaces and devices for rehabilitation.

Authors:  David Behm; Juan Carlos Colado
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

2.  Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men.

Authors:  Cameron J Mitchell; Tyler A Churchward-Venne; Daniel W D West; Nicholas A Burd; Leigh Breen; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-04-19

3.  Intensity-dependent alterations in the excitability of cortical and spinal projections to the knee extensors during isometric and locomotor exercise.

Authors:  J C Weavil; S K Sidhu; T S Mangum; R S Richardson; M Amann
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Normalized EMG to normalized torque relationship of vastus intermedius muscle during isometric knee extension.

Authors:  Kohei Watanabe; Hiroshi Akima
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Recruitment order of quadriceps motor units: femoral nerve vs. direct quadriceps stimulation.

Authors:  Javier Rodriguez-Falces; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Sex differences in quadriceps and hamstrings EMG-moment relationships.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Glenn N Williams
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Interpreting muscle function from EMG: lessons learned from direct measurements of muscle force.

Authors:  Thomas J Roberts; Annette M Gabaldón
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  Medium-intensity, high-volume "hypertrophic" resistance training did not induce improvements in rapid force production in healthy older men.

Authors:  Simon Walker; Heikki Peltonen; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-04-25

9.  Knee extensor and plantar flexor muscle size and function following 90 days of bed rest with or without resistance exercise.

Authors:  Björn A Alkner; Per A Tesch
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Knee Extensor Electromyographic Activity-to-Work Ratio is Greater With Isotonic Than Isokinetic Contractions.

Authors:  Randy J. Schmitz; Kevin C. Westwood
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.