Literature DB >> 10693710

Management of patient skin dose in fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures.

L K Wagner1, B R Archer, A M Cohen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To simulate dose to the skin of a large patient for various operational fluoroscopic conditions and to delineate how to adjust operational conditions to maintain skin dose at acceptable levels.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient entrance skin dose was estimated from measurement of entrance air kerma (dose to air) to a 280-mm water phantom for two angiographic fluoroscopes. Effects on dose for changes in machine floor kVp, source-to-skin distance, air gap, electronic magnification, fluoroscopic dose rate control settings, and fluorographic dose control settings were examined.
RESULTS: Incremental changes in operational parameters are multiplicative and markedly affect total dose delivered to a patient's skin. For long procedures, differences in doses of 8 Gy or more are possible for some combinations of operational techniques.
CONCLUSIONS: Effects on skin dose from changes in operational parameters are multiplicative, not additive. Doses in excess of known thresholds for injury can be exceeded under some operating conditions. Adjusting operational parameters appropriately will markedly reduce dose to a patient's skin. Above all other operational factors, variable pulsed fluoroscopy has the greatest potential for maintaining radiation exposure at low levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10693710     DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61274-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  13 in total

1.  A Rotatable Quality Control Phantom for Evaluating the Performance of Flat Panel Detectors in Imaging Moving Objects.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Haga; Koichi Chida; Yohei Inaba; Yuji Kaga; Taiichiro Meguro; Masayuki Zuguchi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Optimizing care for the obese patient in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Dwight Aberle; Hearns Charles; Steven Hodak; Daniel O'Neill; Rahmi Oklu; Amy R Deipolyi
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  3D cerebral angiography: radiation dose comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Beth A Schueler; David F Kallmes; Harry J Cloft
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Radiation dose reduction: comparative assessment of publication volume between interventional and diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  Jan Hansmann; Thomas Henzler; Ron C Gaba; John N Morelli
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 5.  What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?

Authors:  Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-05-24

6.  Three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast use during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Michael M McNally; Salvatore T Scali; Robert J Feezor; Daniel Neal; Thomas S Huber; Adam W Beck
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 7.  Technical challenges of imaging & image-guided interventions in obese patients.

Authors:  Raul N Uppot
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Impact of imaging approach on radiation dose and associated cancer risk in children undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Kevin D Hill; Chu Wang; Andrew J Einstein; Natalie Januzis; Giao Nguyen; Jennifer S Li; Gregory A Fleming; Terry K Yoshizumi
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  A Study to Compare the Radiation Absorbed Dose of the C-arm Fluoroscopic Modes.

Authors:  Jae Hun Cho; Jae Yun Kim; Joo Eun Kang; Pyong Eun Park; Jae Hun Kim; Jeong Ae Lim; Hae Kyoung Kim; Nam Sik Woo
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2011-11-30

10.  Radiation-induced noncancer risks in interventional cardiology: optimisation of procedures and staff and patient dose reduction.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Aini AbAziz; Ahmad Khairuddin Md Yusof
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.