Literature DB >> 10693556

Revision total knee arthroplasty by impaction bone grafting.

G W Bradley1.   

Abstract

The presence of bone loss in a failed total knee arthroplasty can present a significant reconstructive challenge. Experience with the technique of using impacted morselized allograft with revision components having fixed stems is presented. Nineteen knees (21 patients) were reconstructed using impacted bone graft alone in 14 knees, bone graft plus methylmethacrylate in five knees (including one knee in which the replacement failed), and in three knees morselized bone graft was used in conjunction with structural bone allograft. Minimum followup ranged from 6 months to 62 months for the patients in the current series. These patients represent a relatively small, but growing portion of this surgeon's population of patients undergoing revision knee arthroplasty. Patients with large defects were selected for the study. Histologic specimens from the one failed knee arthroplasty revealed viable, incorporated bone graft. Excluding the replacement that failed, the average improvement in Knee Society combined knee and function scores was 87 points. The principles of revision and primary total joint arthroplasty are applied for achieving a stable implant. Specific to this technique, solid support of the implant-graft interface, graft-host bone interface, and the use of a tight, supportive stem is imperative. The author's experience provides additional support for the use of bone grafting techniques in patients with large bone defects who are undergoing revision total knee replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10693556     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200002000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

1.  Impaction bone grafting for the reconstruction of large bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Rudert; B M Holzapfel; E von Rottkay; D E Holzapfel; U Noeth
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Revision total knee arthroplasty for major osteolysis.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; James A Keeney; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2009

3.  Cementless revision TKA with bone grafting of osseous defects restores bone stock with a low revision rate at 4 to 10 years.

Authors:  S A Hanna; W J S Aston; N J de Roeck; A Gough-Palmer; D P Powles
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A sliding stem in revision total knee arthroplasty provides stability and reduces stress shielding.

Authors:  Huub J Meijerink; Corné J M van Loon; Maarten C de Waal Malefijt; Albert van Kampen; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Patient outcome following revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Puyi Sheng; Matti Lehto; Matti Kataja; Pekka Halonen; Teemu Moilanen; Jorma Pajamäki
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  10-year results following impaction bone grafting of major bone defects in 29 rotational and hinged knee revision arthroplasties: a follow-up of a previous report.

Authors:  Verena Hilgen; Mustafa Citak; Eik Vettorazzi; Carl Haasper; Kimberly Day; Michael Amling; Thorsten Gehrke; Matthias Gebauer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 7.  Allograft Bone as Antibiotic Carrier.

Authors:  Heinz Winkler; Peter Haiden
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2017-01-01

8.  Use of a trabecular metal cone made of tantalum, to treat bone defects during revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alan de Paula Mozella; Ricardo Reiniger Olivero; Hugo Alexandre; Araújo Barros Cobra
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2014-03-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.