Literature DB >> 10693548

The use of allograft bone in lumbar spine surgery.

D M Ehrler1, A R Vaccaro.   

Abstract

Bone grafting is an integral part of many lumbar spinal surgeries. The two choices of bone are autograft and allograft. Each source has its own advantages and disadvantages. The current study is a literature review of allograft bone use in lumbar spine surgery. Allograft bone can be procured in greater quantities than autograft. With standard protocols of harvesting, the risk of disease transfer is negligible. Only fresh-frozen and freeze-dried products are used. Allografts are incorporated slower and to a lesser degree than autografts. Fresh-frozen grafts are stronger, more immunogenic and more completely incorporated than freeze-dried grafts. Allografts used alone or combined with autografts for posterior lumbar spinal procedures have decreased fusion rates compared with autografts. If used anteriorly, allografts are well suited for reconstructive procedures and have good fusion rates, especially if combined with posterior fusions. If used in the proper situations, allograft bone can be used successfully in lumbar spine surgeries.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10693548     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200002000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  45 in total

1.  Cortical allografts in spinal tuberculosis.

Authors:  S Govender; K P S Kumar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Incidence and risk factors of allograft bone failure after calcaneal lengthening.

Authors:  In Hyeok Lee; Chin Youb Chung; Kyoung Min Lee; Soon-Sun Kwon; Sang Young Moon; Ki Jin Jung; Myung Ki Chung; Moon Seok Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Healing properties of allograft from alendronate-treated animal in lumbar spine interbody cage fusion.

Authors:  Qingyun Xue; Haisheng Li; Xuenong Zou; Mathias Bünger; Niels Egund; Martin Lind; Finn Bjarke Christensen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Mesenchymal stem cells combined with biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics promote bone regeneration.

Authors:  T L Livingston; S Gordon; M Archambault; S Kadiyala; K McIntosh; A Smith; S J Peter
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  The Gordon Wilson lecture: using genetic medicine to regenerate diseased organs and protect against the hostile environment.

Authors:  Timothy P O'Connor; Ronald G Crystal
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2004

6.  CT-based classification of long spinal allograft fusion.

Authors:  G H Tan; B G Goss; P J Thorpe; R P Williams
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  [Bone substitutes in scoliosis surgery].

Authors:  T Lerner; H Griefingholt; U Liljenqvist
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  Current status of bone graft options for anterior interbody fusion of the cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anthony Minh Tien Chau; Lileane Liang Xu; Johnny Ho-Yin Wong; Ralph Jasper Mobbs
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Modification of human cancellous bone using Thai silk fibroin and gelatin for enhanced osteoconductive potential.

Authors:  Rungnapa Vorrapakdee; Sorada Kanokpanont; Juthamas Ratanavaraporn; Saranatra Waikakul; Chris Charoenlap; Siriporn Damrongsakkul
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Impact of instrumentation in lumbar spinal fusion in elderly patients: 71 patients followed for 2-7 years.

Authors:  Thomas Andersen; Finn B Christensen; Bent Niedermann; Peter Helmig; Kristian Høy; Ebbe S Hansen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.