AIMS: Microalbuminuria and, to a lesser extent, renal tubular proteins are widely used in the early detection of incipient nephropathy in diabetes mellitus. Recent reports have indicated detrimental effects of storage at -20 degrees C on urine proteins. This study investigated the effects of storage on the measurement of urine proteins and discusses implications for the interpretation of data. METHODS: Two-hundred and sixty-eight specimens, collected from children with Type 1 diabetes, split into duplicate aliquots and stored at -20 degrees C and -70 degrees C, respectively, for 6-8 months, were analysed for albumin, retinol binding protein, N-acetyl glucosaminidase and creatinine, in the same assays to eliminate inter-assay variability. Two independent non-diabetic cohorts of children provided urine specimens, which were stored at -20 degrees C for one cohort and -70 degrees C for the other, to determine normal ranges for urine proteins. RESULTS: Storage at -20 degrees C led to a variable underestimation of all three urine proteins in 20% of specimens. Creatinine was unaffected. This underestimation was greater in more concentrated urine (r2 = 0.38, P < 0.001, n = 262). Consequently storage at -20 degrees C increased the variance of the albumin/ creatinine ratio more than the variance of albumin concentration. Temperature of storage affected the normal range, which was 0.1-2.1 mg/mmol at -20 degrees C compared to 0.3-3.1 mg/mmol at -70 degrees C. The prevalence of microalbuminuria (> 2SD above the geometric mean in non-diabetic specimens stored at -20 degrees C) was 27% after storage at -70 degrees C vs. 24% after -20 degrees C. The prevalence of microalbuminuria (>2SD above the geometric mean in nondiabetic specimens stored at -70 degrees C) was 21% after storage at -70 degrees C vs. 17% after -20 degrees C. CONCLUSIONS: Urine proteins are significantly but variably underestimated after storage at -20 degrees C. These effects account for increased variance and differences in the normal range, but have less effect on the detection of microalbuminuria than might be predicted.
AIMS: Microalbuminuria and, to a lesser extent, renal tubular proteins are widely used in the early detection of incipient nephropathy in diabetes mellitus. Recent reports have indicated detrimental effects of storage at -20 degrees C on urine proteins. This study investigated the effects of storage on the measurement of urine proteins and discusses implications for the interpretation of data. METHODS: Two-hundred and sixty-eight specimens, collected from children with Type 1 diabetes, split into duplicate aliquots and stored at -20 degrees C and -70 degrees C, respectively, for 6-8 months, were analysed for albumin, retinol binding protein, N-acetyl glucosaminidase and creatinine, in the same assays to eliminate inter-assay variability. Two independent non-diabetic cohorts of children provided urine specimens, which were stored at -20 degrees C for one cohort and -70 degrees C for the other, to determine normal ranges for urine proteins. RESULTS: Storage at -20 degrees C led to a variable underestimation of all three urine proteins in 20% of specimens. Creatinine was unaffected. This underestimation was greater in more concentrated urine (r2 = 0.38, P < 0.001, n = 262). Consequently storage at -20 degrees C increased the variance of the albumin/ creatinine ratio more than the variance of albumin concentration. Temperature of storage affected the normal range, which was 0.1-2.1 mg/mmol at -20 degrees C compared to 0.3-3.1 mg/mmol at -70 degrees C. The prevalence of microalbuminuria (> 2SD above the geometric mean in non-diabetic specimens stored at -20 degrees C) was 27% after storage at -70 degrees C vs. 24% after -20 degrees C. The prevalence of microalbuminuria (>2SD above the geometric mean in nondiabetic specimens stored at -70 degrees C) was 21% after storage at -70 degrees C vs. 17% after -20 degrees C. CONCLUSIONS: Urine proteins are significantly but variably underestimated after storage at -20 degrees C. These effects account for increased variance and differences in the normal range, but have less effect on the detection of microalbuminuria than might be predicted.
Authors: Alan R Dyer; Philip Greenland; Paul Elliott; Martha L Daviglus; George Claeys; Hugo Kesteloot; Queenie Chan; Hirotsugu Ueshima; Jeremiah Stamler Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Matthew P Welberry Smith; Rosamonde E Banks; Steven L Wood; Andrew J P Lewington; Peter J Selby Journal: Nat Rev Nephrol Date: 2009-10-27 Impact factor: 28.314
Authors: Chi-Yuan Hsu; Shawn Ballard; Daniel Batlle; Joseph V Bonventre; Erwin P Böttinger; Harold I Feldman; Jon B Klein; Josef Coresh; John H Eckfeldt; Lesley A Inker; Paul L Kimmel; John W Kusek; Kathleen D Liu; Michael Mauer; Theodore E Mifflin; Mark E Molitch; Gary L Nelsestuen; Casey M Rebholz; Brad H Rovin; Venkata S Sabbisetti; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Ramachandran S Vasan; Sushrut S Waikar; Krista M Whitehead; Robert G Nelson Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Marie C Hogan; Heather N Reich; Peter J Nelson; Sharon G Adler; Daniel C Cattran; Gerald B Appel; Debbie S Gipson; Matthias Kretzler; Jonathan P Troost; John C Lieske Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 10.612