Literature DB >> 10690542

Cathepsin B, a prognostic indicator in lymph node-negative breast carcinoma patients: comparison with cathepsin D, cathepsin L, and other clinical indicators.

T T Lah1, M Cercek, A Blejec, J Kos, E Gorodetsky, R Somers, I Daskal.   

Abstract

New prognosticators are needed for breast cancer patients after the initial surgical treatment to make therapeutic decisions that ultimately will affect their DFS. These consist of specific proteolytic enzymes including lysosomal endopeptidases. In this study, the activity and protein concentrations of cathepsins (Cats) D, B, and L were measured in 282 invasive breast tumor cytosols. These potential biological prognostic indicators were compared with other histopathological parameters, such as tumor size, lymph node involvement, tumor-node-metastasis stage, histological grade, DNA analysis, and steroid receptors. CatD protein concentration correlated with lymph node involvement. CatB and CatL levels correlated significantly with Scarf-Bloom-Richardson histological grade and were also higher in estrogen-negative tumors, and CatB was higher in larger tumors. As prognostic markers, CatB concentration was significant for increased risk for recurrence in the entire patient population and specifically also in lymph node-negative patients as follows: high CatB concentration (above 371 micrograms/g) in tumor cytosols was significant (P < 0.00) for high risk of recurrence but was of only borderline prognostic significance (P < 0.06) for overall survival of all patients. In lymph node-negative patients, CatB (above 240 micrograms/g, P < 0.003) was highly significant for recurrence-free survival, followed by CatL (above 20 micrograms/g, P < 0.049) and CatD (above 45 nmol/g, P < 0.044) concentrations. For overall survival of node-negative patients, only CatB was a significant (P < 0.014) prognosticator. We conclude that CatB is useful as a prognostic indicator in lymph node-negative patients. This suggests that selective adjuvant therapy should be applied in this lower risk group of patients when high levels of CatB are determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10690542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  23 in total

Review 1.  Cathepsin L targeting in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Dhivya R Sudhan; Dietmar W Siemann
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 12.310

2.  Significance and prognostic value of lysosomal enzyme activities measured in surgically operated adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction and squamous cell carcinomas of the lower third of esophagus.

Authors:  Aron Altorjay; Balazs Paal; Nicolette Sohar; Janos Kiss; Imre Szanto; Istvan Sohar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Proteolytic-antiproteolytic balance and its regulation in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Elzbieta Skrzydlewska; Mariola Sulkowska; Mariusz Koda; Stanislaw Sulkowski
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Prognostic and therapeutic relevance of cathepsin B in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Garima Pandey; Sameer Bakhshi; Manoj Kumar; Bhaskar Thakur; Prerna Jain; Punit Kaur; Shyam S Chauhan
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Quantitative electrochemical detection of cathepsin B activity in complex tissue lysates using enhanced AC voltammetry at carbon nanofiber nanoelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Luxi Z Swisher; Allan M Prior; Stephanie Shishido; Thu A Nguyen; Duy H Hua; Jun Li
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 10.618

6.  Serpin B3/B4, activated by STAT3, promote survival of squamous carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Simi T Ahmed; James E Darnell
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 7.  Cysteine cathepsin proteases: regulators of cancer progression and therapeutic response.

Authors:  Oakley C Olson; Johanna A Joyce
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 8.  Deciphering the molecular basis of breast cancer metastasis with mouse models.

Authors:  Ann E Vernon; Suzanne J Bakewell; Lewis A Chodosh
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.514

9.  Tissue microarrays of human tumor xenografts: characterization of proteins involved in migration and angiogenesis for applications in the development of targeted anticancer agents.

Authors:  Victoria Smith; Gregory J Wirth; Heinz-Herbert Fiebig; Angelika M Burger
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.069

10.  Premalignant variations in extracellular matrix composition in chemically induced hepatocellular carcinoma in rats.

Authors:  Nabil M Abdel-Hamid
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 1.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.