Literature DB >> 10689801

Quantitative genetics in conservation biology.

R Frankham1.   

Abstract

Most of the major genetic concerns in conservation biology, including inbreeding depression, loss of evolutionary potential, genetic adaptation to captivity and outbreeding depression, involve quantitative genetics. Small population size leads to inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity and so increases extinction risk. Captive populations of endangered species are managed to maximize the retention of genetic diversity by minimizing kinship, with subsidiary efforts to minimize inbreeding. There is growing evidence that genetic adaptation to captivity is a major issue in the genetic management of captive populations of endangered species as it reduces reproductive fitness when captive populations are reintroduced into the wild. This problem is not currently addressed, but it can be alleviated by deliberately fragmenting captive populations, with occasional exchange of immigrants to avoid excessive inbreeding. The extent and importance of outbreeding depression is a matter of controversy. Currently, an extremely cautious approach is taken to mixing populations. However, this cannot continue if fragmented populations are to be adequately managed to minimize extinctions. Most genetic management recommendations for endangered species arise directly, or indirectly, from quantitative genetic considerations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10689801     DOI: 10.1017/s001667239900405x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  14 in total

1.  Genetic variability at neutral markers, quantitative trait land trait in a subdivided population under selection.

Authors:  Valérie Le Corre; Antoine Kremer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inbreeding depression and low between-population heterosis in recently diverged experimental populations of a selfing species.

Authors:  Y Rousselle; M Thomas; N Galic; I Bonnin; I Goldringer
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  The different sources of variation in inbreeding depression, heterosis and outbreeding depression in a metapopulation of Physa acuta.

Authors:  Juan Sebastián Escobar; Antoine Nicot; Patrice David
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The efficiency of close inbreeding to reduce genetic adaptation to captivity.

Authors:  K Theodorou; D Couvet
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Local adaptation in the monocarpic perennial Carlina vulgaris at different spatial scales across Europe.

Authors:  Ute Becker; Guy Colling; Petr Dostal; Anna Jakobsson; Diethart Matthies
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Rapid differentiation of experimental populations of wheat for heading time in response to local climatic conditions.

Authors:  Isabelle Goldringer; Claire Prouin; Michel Rousset; Nathalie Galic; Isabelle Bonnin
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  ISSR and DAMD markers revealed high genetic variability within Flavoparmelia caperata in Western Himalaya (India).

Authors:  Niraj Singh; Rajesh Bajpai; K S Mahar; Vandana Tiwari; D K Upreti; T S Rana
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2014-08-15

8.  Invasive predators deplete genetic diversity of island lizards.

Authors:  Amandine Gasc; M C Duryea; Robert M Cox; Andrew Kern; Ryan Calsbeek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Molecular and quantitative trait variation within and among small fragmented populations of the endangered plant species Psilopeganum sinense.

Authors:  Qigang Ye; Feiyan Tang; Na Wei; Xiaohong Yao
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Reintroductions and genetic introgression from domestic pigs have shaped the genetic population structure of Northwest European wild boar.

Authors:  Daniel J Goedbloed; Pim van Hooft; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Katharina Langenbeck; Walburga Lutz; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Sip E van Wieren; Ron C Ydenberg; Herbert H T Prins
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.