Literature DB >> 18791233

The different sources of variation in inbreeding depression, heterosis and outbreeding depression in a metapopulation of Physa acuta.

Juan Sebastián Escobar1, Antoine Nicot, Patrice David.   

Abstract

Understanding how parental distance affects offspring fitness, i.e., the effects of inbreeding and outbreeding in natural populations, is a major goal in evolutionary biology. While inbreeding is often associated with fitness reduction (inbreeding depression), interpopulation outcrossing may have either positive (heterosis) or negative (outbreeding depression) effects. Within a metapopulation, all phenomena may occur with various intensities depending on the focal population (especially its effective size) and the trait studied. However, little is known about interpopulation variation at this scale. We here examine variation in inbreeding depression, heterosis, and outbreeding depression on life-history traits across a full-life cycle, within a metapopulation of the hermaphroditic snail Physa acuta. We show that all three phenomena can co-occur at this scale, although they are not always expressed on the same traits. A large variation in inbreeding depression, heterosis, and outbreeding depression is observed among local populations. We provide evidence that, as expected from theory, small and isolated populations enjoy higher heterosis upon outcrossing than do large, open populations. These results emphasize the need for an integrated theory accounting for the effects of both deleterious mutations and genetic incompatibilities within metapopulations and to take into account the variability of the focal population to understand the genetic consequences of inbreeding and outbreeding at this scale.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18791233      PMCID: PMC2581960          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.092718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  48 in total

1.  The contribution of male-sterility mutations to inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  J H Willis
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  The role of deleterious mutations in allopatric speciation.

Authors:  Max Shpak
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Alternative Hypotheses of Hybrid Vigor.

Authors:  J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1948-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Studies on Hybrid Sterility. II. Localization of Sterility Factors in Drosophila Pseudoobscura Hybrids.

Authors:  T Dobzhansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1936-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Reliable selfing rate estimates from imperfect population genetic data.

Authors:  Patrice David; Benoît Pujol; Frédérique Viard; Vincent Castella; Jérôme Goudet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  The Effects of a Bottleneck on Inbreeding Depression and the Genetic Load.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Philippe Jarne
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities.

Authors:  H A Orr; M Turelli
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Effect of cross proximity on progeny fitness in a rare and a common species of Eupatorium (Asteraceae).

Authors:  D Byers
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  A fine-scale genetic analysis of hybrid incompatibilities in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas.

Authors:  J Merilä; B C Sheldon
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.821

View more
  34 in total

1.  Inbreeding depression and low between-population heterosis in recently diverged experimental populations of a selfing species.

Authors:  Y Rousselle; M Thomas; N Galic; I Bonnin; I Goldringer
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Surprising fitness consequences of GC-biased gene conversion. II. Heterosis.

Authors:  Sylvain Glémin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Darwin and genetics.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth; Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The genetics of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; John H Willis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Source population characteristics affect heterosis following genetic rescue of fragmented plant populations.

Authors:  M Pickup; D L Field; D M Rowell; A G Young
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Drift load in populations of small size and low density.

Authors:  Y Willi; P Griffin; J Van Buskirk
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Quantitative trait locus analysis of stage-specific inbreeding depression in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas.

Authors:  Louis V Plough; Dennis Hedgecock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Origins of eukaryotic sexual reproduction.

Authors:  Ursula Goodenough; Joseph Heitman
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 10.005

9.  Contrasting the distribution of phenotypic and molecular variation in the freshwater snail Biomphalaria pfeifferi, the intermediate host of Schistosoma mansoni.

Authors:  Y-N T Tian-Bi; P Jarne; J-N K Konan; J Utzinger; E K N'Goran
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Within- and among-population impact of genetic erosion on adult fitness-related traits in the European tree frog Hyla arborea.

Authors:  E Luquet; J-P Léna; P David; J Prunier; P Joly; T Lengagne; N Perrin; S Plénet
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.