Literature DB >> 10689045

Faces call for attention: evidence from patients with visual extinction.

P Vuilleumier1.   

Abstract

Three patients with left spatial neglect and visual extinction from right brain damage were studied to determine whether faces are privileged in summoning attention. In a first experiment, either a face, a name, or a meaningless shape were briefly presented in the right, left or both visual hemifields. On bilateral trials, all patients extinguished a left-side face much less often than a left-side name or a left-side shape. Conversely, they extinguished a left-side shape more often when it was accompanied by a right-side face rather than a right-side name. In a second experiment, either a face or a scrambled face could appear in the right, left or both hemifields. Again, on bilateral trials, a left-side face was less likely to be missed than a scrambled one. These results suggest an advantage of faces in capturing attention and overcoming extinction, which may be related to their special biological and social value, or to the very efficient and automatic operation of specific perceptual processses that extract facial organization in extrastriate visual areas. These findings also demonstrate that the distribution of spatial attention and extinction can be modulated by the relevance of visual stimuli. This implies that substantial analysis and categorization may take place in the visual system before information from the contralesional field is selected for, or excluded from, attentive vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10689045     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00107-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  36 in total

1.  Race and gender of faces can be ignored.

Authors:  Janice E Murray; Liana Machado; Benjamin Knight
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-10-15

2.  Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Kim M Curby; Pawel Skudlarski; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Faces retain attention.

Authors:  Markus Bindemann; A Mike Burton; Ignace T C Hooge; Rob Jenkins; Edward H F de Haan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

4.  Age-Group Differences in Interference from Young and Older Emotional Faces.

Authors:  Natalie C Ebner; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2010-11-01

5.  Brief report: faces cause less distraction in autism.

Authors:  Deborah M Riby; Philippa H Brown; Nicola Jones; Mary Hanley
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-04

6.  ERP responses to face repetition during passive viewing: a nonverbal measure of social motivation in children with autism and typical development.

Authors:  Alexandra P Key; Blythe A Corbett
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Attention to faces in Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Deborah M Riby; Nicola Jones; Philippa H Brown; Lucy J Robinson; Stephen R H Langton; Vicki Bruce; Leigh M Riby
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2011-09

Review 8.  Human facial expressions as adaptations: Evolutionary questions in facial expression research.

Authors:  K L Schmidt; J F Cohn
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  Unconscious perception of non-threatening facial emotion in parietal extinction.

Authors:  Mark A Williams; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Top-down and bottom-up modulation in processing bimodal face/voice stimuli.

Authors:  Marianne Latinus; Rufin VanRullen; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.