Literature DB >> 10688855

Carcinogen macromolecular adducts and their measurement.

M C Poirier1, R M Santella, A Weston.   

Abstract

Damage to DNA induced by carcinogenic chemicals reflects exposure and is directly related to tumor formation, whereas modification of protein provides relatively precise dosimetry for stable adducts of proteins with a known half-life. Sophisticated methods for the detection and quantitation of DNA and protein adducts have been developed during the last approximately 25 years. For DNA adducts the most widely used methods include electrochemical detection, mass spectrometry, fluorescence and phosphorescence spectroscopy, immunoassays and immunohistochemistry and (32)P-post-labeling. Detection limits for quantitative assays are typically in the range of 1 adduct in 10(7) or 10(9) nucleotides. However, accelerator mass spectrometry, which is highly sophisticated but less accessible, has a detection limit of approximately 1 adduct in 10(12) nucleotides. Methods for the determination of protein adducts include immunoassay and a variety of elegant high-resolution mass spectrometry approaches. The detection limit of approximately 0.1 fmol for protein adducts, is based primarily on method specificity and the availability of large quantities of sample material. Using these highly sensitive methods a major achievement has been the biomonitoring of chemically exposed human populations. Validation of macromolecular adduct formation in humans has been predicated on studies in animal models. Adduct formation in humans appears to be indicative of molecular dosimetry and suggestive of increased human cancer risk. However, despite the large body of literature documenting DNA and protein adduct molecular dosimetry for many carcinogen exposures, the relationship between adduct formation and human cancer risk has been defined for only a few carcinogens. Thus, elucidation of this association remains a compelling challenge. For the future, integration of DNA and protein adduct measurements together with documentation of correlative and subsequent events, and host susceptibility factors, within the context of valid molecular epidemiologic study designs, will further our understanding of human disease mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10688855     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/21.3.353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  36 in total

1.  Aristolactam-DNA adducts are a biomarker of environmental exposure to aristolochic acid.

Authors:  Bojan Jelaković; Sandra Karanović; Ivana Vuković-Lela; Frederick Miller; Karen L Edwards; Jovan Nikolić; Karla Tomić; Neda Slade; Branko Brdar; Robert J Turesky; Želimir Stipančić; Damir Dittrich; Arthur P Grollman; Kathleen G Dickman
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure in oesophageal tissue and risk of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in north-eastern Iran.

Authors:  Behnoush Abedi-Ardekani; Farin Kamangar; Stephen M Hewitt; Pierre Hainaut; Masoud Sotoudeh; Christian C Abnet; Philip R Taylor; Paolo Boffetta; Reza Malekzadeh; Sanford M Dawsey
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Analysis of r-7,t-8,9,c-10-tetrahydroxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene in human urine: a biomarker for directly assessing carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure plus metabolic activation.

Authors:  Yan Zhong; Steven G Carmella; J Bradley Hochalter; Silvia Balbo; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 4.  DNA adducts: Formation, biological effects, and new biospecimens for mass spectrometric measurements in humans.

Authors:  Byeong Hwa Yun; Jingshu Guo; Medjda Bellamri; Robert J Turesky
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 10.946

5.  Intrauterine exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, fine particulate matter and early wheeze. Prospective birth cohort study in 4-year olds.

Authors:  Wieslaw A Jedrychowski; Frederica P Perera; Umberto Maugeri; Dorota Mrozek-Budzyn; Elzbieta Mroz; Maria Klimaszewska-Rembiasz; Elzbieta Flak; Susan Edwards; John Spengler; Ryszard Jacek; Agata Sowa
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.377

6.  Human Biomonitoring of DNA Adducts by Ion Trap Multistage Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jingshu Guo; Robert J Turesky
Journal:  Curr Protoc Nucleic Acid Chem       Date:  2016-09-01

7.  Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue as a source for quantitation of carcinogen DNA adducts: aristolochic acid as a prototype carcinogen.

Authors:  Byeong Hwa Yun; Lihua Yao; Bojan Jelaković; Jovan Nikolić; Kathleen G Dickman; Arthur P Grollman; Thomas A Rosenquist; Robert J Turesky
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 8.  Genetic unraveling of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sabha Rasool; Vamiq Rasool; Tahira Naqvi; Bashir A Ganai; Bhahwal Ali Shah
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-02-27

9.  Oxidative DNA damage in peripheral leukocytes and its association with expression and polymorphisms of hOGG1: a study of adolescents in a high risk region for hepatocellular carcinoma in China.

Authors:  Tao Peng; Han-Ming Shen; Zhi-Ming Liu; Lu-Nan Yan; Min-Hao Peng; Le-Qun Li; Ren-Xiang Liang; Zong-Liang Wei; Barry Halliwell; Choon Nam Ong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Biomarkers of induced active and passive smoking damage.

Authors:  Maura Lodovici; Elisabetta Bigagli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.