Literature DB >> 10687974

Removal of UroLume endoprosthesis: experience of the North American Study Group for detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia application.

J B Gajewski1, M B Chancellor, C F Ackman, R A Appell, J Bennett, J Binard, T B Boone, M P Chetner, J A Crewalk, A Defalco, J Foote, B Green, S Juma, S Y Jung, T A Linsenmeyer, J N Macaluso, R Macmillan, M Mayo, H Ozawa, C G Roehrborn, J Schmidt, P J Shenot, A Stone, A Vazquez, W Killorin, D A Rivas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We present the experience of the North American UroLume Multicenter Study Group with removal of the UroLume endoprosthesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 160 neurologically impaired patients were enrolled in the North American UroLume Multicenter Study Group for detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia application. Analysis was performed in 2 groups of patients in which the device was removed during insertion and after implantation, respectively.
RESULTS: Device retrieval was required during insertion in 21 patients (13%) mainly due to misplacement or migration in 17. Extraction was done with minimal complications and in all but 2 cases subsequent UroLume implantation was successful. Of 158 men with the device in place 31 (19.6%) required removal. In 34 procedures 44 devices were removed, mainly due to migration. Time from implantation to removal ranged from 4 days to 66 months (mean 22 months). The UroLume was removed en bloc in 20 cases and in parts or wire by wire in 19. The majority of patients had no or minimal complications after extraction. Only 2 patients had serious temporary complications, including bleeding and urethral injury, with no lasting consequences. No malignancy developed as a result of UroLume insertion.
CONCLUSIONS: While there is a potential for urethral injury and bleeding, UroLume endoprosthesis removal is largely a simple procedure with minimal complications and consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10687974     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67801-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

Review 1.  Reconstructive Management Options of Delayed Complications Following Bladder Outlet Surgery.

Authors:  Nora Baker; Carmen Tong; Jay Simhan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Treatment of overactive bladder and incontinence in the elderly.

Authors:  Darshan Shah; Gopal Badlani
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

3.  Simultaneous Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate with Removal of the Permanent Prostatic Urethral Stent Using the High-Power Holmium Laser: Technique in Two Cases and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Indraneel Banerjee; Nicholas Anthony Smith; Jonathan E Katz; Aniruddha Gokhale; Rashmi Shah; Hemendra Navinchandra Shah
Journal:  J Endourol Case Rep       Date:  2020-12-29

4.  Removal of migrated metallic prostatic stent by holmium laser.

Authors:  P M Mahajan; A S Padhye; A A Bhave; S S Bapat
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-07

Review 5.  Detrusor sphincter dyssynergia: a review of physiology, diagnosis, and treatment strategies.

Authors:  John T Stoffel
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-02

Review 6.  Minimally invasive surgical therapies for benign prostatic hypertrophy: The rise in minimally invasive surgical therapies.

Authors:  Daniel Christidis; Shannon McGrath; Marlon Perera; Todd Manning; Damien Bolton; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2017-01-19

7.  Endoscopic removal of a proximal urethral stent using a holmium laser: Case report and literature review.

Authors:  Francisco Botelho; Anil A Thomas; Ranko Miocinovic; Kenneth W Angermeier
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2012-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.