Literature DB >> 10687902

Mandibular third molars: oral surgeons' assessment of the indications for removal.

R Liedholm1, K Knutsson, L Lysell, M Rohlin.   

Abstract

The aim was to examine oral surgeons' assessment of the indications for removal of mandibular third molars. Questionnaires were distributed to seven oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics. The oral surgeons were asked to record whether or not there was associated disease. Three other factors were recorded: patient's age, and angular position and extent of eruption of the molars. The strength of the indication for removal was rated on a visual analogue scale (VAS) where 0= weakest and 100= strongest indication for removal. The results were based on data from 666 molars: 118 (18%) had no disease, 465 (70%) had one associated disease, 77 (11%) had two and 6 (1%) had three. The indication for removal as expressed by the mean VAS for molars with no disease was assessed to be weaker (P<0.05) than that for molars with one, two, or three diseases. The only factor that influenced the indication for removal in molars with no disease was the patient's age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10687902     DOI: 10.1054/bjom.1999.0184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  7 in total

1.  Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Retrospective Study of 1198 Cases to Assess Indications for Surgical Removal, and Correlation with Age, Sex and Type of Impaction-A Single Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Shital Patel; Saloni Mansuri; Faizan Shaikh; Taksh Shah
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-06-10

2.  International benchmarking of hospitalisations for impacted teeth: a 10-year retrospective study from the United Kingdom, France and Australia.

Authors:  A A Anjrini; E Kruger; M Tennant
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Hospitalisation for the surgical removal of impacted teeth: Has Australia followed international trends?

Authors:  Roslind Preethi George; Estie Kruger; Marc Tennant
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2011-08-31

4.  Indications for removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a single institutional experience in Libya.

Authors:  B Krishnan; Mohammad Hossni El Sheikh; El-Gehani Rafa; H Orafi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2009-11-21

5.  Decision making in third molar surgery: a survey of Brazilian oral and maxillofacial surgeons.

Authors:  Igor Batista Camargo; Auremir Rocha Melo; André Vajgel Fernandes; Larry L Cunningham; José R Laureano Filho; Joseph E Van Sickels
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.607

6.  Clinician-related factors behind the decision to extract an asymptomatic lower third molar. A cross-sectional study based on Spanish and Portuguese dentists.

Authors:  D Alves-Pereira; D Pereira-Silva; R Figueiredo; C Gay-Escoda; E Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-09-01

7.  How confident are general dental practitioners in their decision to administer antibiotic prophylaxis? A questionnaire study.

Authors:  Eva Ellervall; Berndt Brehmer; Kerstin Knutsson
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.