Literature DB >> 25879578

Decision making in third molar surgery: a survey of Brazilian oral and maxillofacial surgeons.

Igor Batista Camargo1,2,3, Auremir Rocha Melo1, André Vajgel Fernandes1, Larry L Cunningham4, José R Laureano Filho5, Joseph E Van Sickels6.   

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the variations in decision making among Brazilian oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS) and trainees in relation to third molar surgery. A survey on 18 diverse clinical situations related to the assessment and treatment of the third molar surgeries was conducted during the 20th Brazilian National OMFS meeting. Participants were divided into three groups according to their level of training. Another variable studied was length of experience. Correlation between the question answers and the variables was analysed using the chi-square test and the f test. The mean age of participants was 32.68 years, and their mean length of experience was 5.24 years. There were no statistical differences between the level of training and number of years of experience and the responses to 15 of the 18 questions on clinical situations. However, differences were found in responses to prophylactic extraction of asymptomatic third molars, use of non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during the preoperative surgical period and the use of additional imaging to plan extractions. The group with shorter time of experience (3.8 ± 3.94 years) tended to recommend extractions of asymptomatic third molars more frequently compared with the more experienced surgeons (P = 0.041). More experienced surgeons used NSAIDs in the preoperative surgical period, whereas the majority of the youngest surgeons (4.1 ± 5.96 years of experience) did not (P = 0.0042). The certificated trained and in practice group tended to treat deep lower third molar impactions based on the findings of a panoramic radiograph, without obtaining additional imaging [cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)] before treatment (P = 0.0132). Decision making regarding third molar treatment differs according to the level of training and is influenced by the number of years of experience. Therefore, further continuous education programmes in this area are warranted to make recommendations regarding third molars consistent with the current literature.
© 2015 FDI World Dental Federation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Third molar; decision making; extraction; oral surgery; survey

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25879578      PMCID: PMC9376505          DOI: 10.1111/idj.12165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Dent J        ISSN: 0020-6539            Impact factor:   2.607


  28 in total

1.  Indications for elective therapeutic third molar removal: the evidence is in.

Authors:  Leon A Assael
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Methods of determining the relationship of the mandibular canal and third molars: a survey of Australian oral and maxillofacial surgeons.

Authors:  B Koong; M J Pharoah; M Bulsara; M Tennant
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.291

3.  Evaluation of intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement on classifying lower third molars according to the systems of Pell and Gregory and of Winter.

Authors:  Nieves Almendros-Marqués; Leonardo Berini-Aytés; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Effectiveness of clinical practice guideline implementation on lower third molar management in improving clinical decision-making: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wil J M van der Sanden; Dirk G Mettes; Alphons J M Plasschaert; Richard P T M Grol; Jan Mulder; Emiel H Verdonschot
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.612

5.  The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study.

Authors:  H Ghaeminia; G J Meijer; A Soehardi; W A Borstlap; J Mulder; O J C Vlijmen; S J Bergé; T J J Maal
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  Assessing the need for computed tomography for lower-third-molar extraction: a survey among 322 dentists.

Authors:  S Sivolella; G Boccuzzo; E Gasparini; G De Conti; M Berengo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  NIH consensus development conference for removal of third molars.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Oral Surg       Date:  1980-03

Review 8.  Interventions for treating asymptomatic impacted wisdom teeth in adolescents and adults.

Authors:  T G Mettes; M E L Nienhuijs; W J M van der Sanden; E H Verdonschot; A J M Plasschaert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-04-18

9.  Prescriptions of NSAIDs to patients undergoing third molar surgery : an observational, prospective, multicentre survey.

Authors:  Luca Levrini; M Carraro; S Rizzo; S Salgarello; E Bertelli; G A Pelliccioni; V Garau; M Bandettini; S Caputi; A Lörincz; A Szûcs
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

10.  Third molar surgery: the patient's and the clinician's perspective.

Authors:  Waseem Jerjes; Tahwinder Upile; Panagiotis Kafas; Syedda Abbas; Jubli Rob; Eileen McCarthy; Peter McCarthy; Colin Hopper
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2009-10-24
View more
  1 in total

1.  The wisdom behind the third molars removal: A prospective study of 106 cases.

Authors:  Kerdoud Ouassime; Aloua Rachid; Kaouani Amine; Belem Ousmane; Slimani Faiçal
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.