Literature DB >> 1068640

A comparative study of condenser humidifiers.

A K Walker, D W Bethune.   

Abstract

Three currently available condenser humidifiers were studied to assess their ability to conserve water loss and to measure the resistance imposed by the apparatus. The value and possible effectiveness of these devices in clinical practice is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1976        PMID： 1068640     DOI： 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11950.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN： 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  6 in total

1.  Laboratory evaluation of heat-and-moisture exchangers.

Authors:  T Kugimiya; T G Phuc; K Numata
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  A review of the mechanisms and methods of humidification of inspired gases.

Authors:  M P Shelly; G M Lloyd; G R Park
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  A new hygroscopic condenser humidifier.

Authors:  C Stoutenbeek; D Miranda; D Zandstra
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  An evaluation of the heat and moisture exchange performance of four ventilator circuit filters.

Authors:  C Jackson; A R Webb
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Humidification and heating of inhaled gas in patients with artificial airway. A narrative review.

Authors:  Gustavo Adrián Plotnikow; Matias Accoce; Emiliano Navarro; Norberto Tiribelli
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2018-03

6.  Measurement of tracheal temperature is not a reliable index of total respiratory heat loss in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  L Thomachot; X Viviand; P Lagier; J M Dejode; J Albanèse; C Martin
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2000-12-08       Impact factor: 9.097
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.