Literature DB >> 10686267

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in controlled treatment studies: are some "sham" forms active?

C K Loo1, J L Taylor, S C Gandevia, B N McDarmont, P B Mitchell, P S Sachdev.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carefully designed controlled studies are essential in further evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in psychiatric disorders. A major methodological concern is the design of the "sham" control for TMS. An ideal sham would produce negligible cortical stimulation in conjunction with a scalp sensation akin to real treatment. Strategies employed so far include alterations in the position of the stimulating coil, but there has been little systematic study of their validity. In this study, we investigated the effects of different coil positions on cortical activation and scalp sensation.
METHODS: In nine normal subjects, single TMS pulses were administered at a range of intensities with a "figure eight" coil held in various positions over the left primary motor cortex. Responses were measured as motor-evoked potentials in the right first dorsal interosseus muscle. Scalp sensation to TMS with the coil in various positions over the prefrontal area was also assessed.
RESULTS: None of the coil positions studied met the criteria for an ideal sham. Arrangements associated with a higher likelihood of scalp sensation were also more likely to stimulate the cortex.
CONCLUSIONS: The choice of a sham for TMS involves a trade-off between effective blinding and truly inactive "stimulation." Further research is needed to develop the best sham condition for a range of applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10686267     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00285-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0006-3223            Impact factor:   13.382


  51 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances: Psychiatry.

Authors:  D Lyons; D M McLoughlin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-24

2.  An rTMS study into self-face recognition using video-morphing technique.

Authors:  Christine Heinisch; Hubert R Dinse; Martin Tegenthoff; Georg Juckel; Martin Brüne
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Remote effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the human pharyngeal motor system.

Authors:  Satish Mistry; Emilia Michou; John Rothwell; Shaheen Hamdy
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  The influence of rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on Stroop task performance.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt; Rudi De Raedt; Chris Baeken; Lemke Leyman; Hugo D'haenen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  rTMS to the right inferior parietal lobule disrupts self-other discrimination.

Authors:  Lucina Q Uddin; Istvan Molnar-Szakacs; Eran Zaidel; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation for the Management of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Abdullah Aamir; Ayesha Girach; Ptolemaios Georgios Sarrigiannis; Marios Hadjivassiliou; Antonela Paladini; Giustino Varrassi; Panagiotis Zis
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Perturbation of visuospatial attention by high-frequency offline rTMS.

Authors:  Yu Jin; Claus C Hilgetag
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Repetitive TMS combined with exposure therapy for PTSD: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Osuch; Brenda E Benson; David A Luckenbaugh; Marilla Geraci; Robert M Post; Una McCann
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2008-03-28

9.  Mapping the after-effects of theta burst stimulation on the human auditory cortex with functional imaging.

Authors:  Jamila Andoh; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of Wernicke's and Right homologous sites to curtail "voices": a randomized trial.

Authors:  Ralph E Hoffman; Kun Wu; Brian Pittman; John D Cahill; Keith A Hawkins; Thomas Fernandez; Jonas Hannestad
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.