Literature DB >> 10683402

Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect: influence of line geometry.

M E McCourt1, M Garlinghouse.   

Abstract

A variety of stimulus factors have recently been shown to influence the performance of normal subjects on line bisection tasks (i.e., pseudoneglect), independent of motoric factors such as scanning or hand use [McCourt & Jewell (1999) Neuropsychologia 35, 843-55]. An experiment is described which further examined the modulating influence of line geometry in determining the magnitude of pseudoneglect. Subjects bisected horizontally oriented trapezoidal lines presented in central vision whose narrow end pointed either left or right. A highly significant influence of line geometry was found which modulated a tonic leftward error (i.e., pseudoneglect). The results are interpreted in the context of a "center-of-mass" effect [Shuren, Jacobs & Heilman (1997) Brain and Cognition, 34, 293-300]. Further studies designed to tease apart the potentially independent effects of perceptual and attentional asymmetry on bisection performance are suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10683402     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00085-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  9 in total

Review 1.  Spatial neglect.

Authors:  A Kirk
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  "Graspability" of objects affects gaze patterns during perception and action tasks.

Authors:  Loni Desanghere; J J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  A critical review and meta-analysis of the perceptual pseudoneglect across psychiatric disorders: is there a continuum?

Authors:  M Ribolsi; G Di Lorenzo; G Lisi; C Niolu; A Siracusano
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-11-07

4.  Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues.

Authors:  Yamaya Sosa; Aaron M Clarke; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.

Authors:  Yamaya Sosa; Wolfgang A Teder-Sälejärvi; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Hemispheric asymmetry and callosal integration of visuospatial attention in schizophrenia: a tachistoscopic line bisection study.

Authors:  Mark E McCourt; Marina Shpaner; Daniel C Javitt; John J Foxe
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  The effect of acute ethanol challenge on global visuospatial attention: exaggeration of leftward bias in line bisection.

Authors:  Lynnette Leone; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2009-03-25

8.  Lighting direction and visual field modulate perceived intensity of illumination.

Authors:  Mark E McCourt; Barbara Blakeslee; Ganesh Padmanabhan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-24

9.  Moving Advertisements Systematically Affect Gaze Behavior and Performance in the Soccer Penalty Kick.

Authors:  Gareth Paterson; John van der Kamp; Geert Savelsbergh
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-01-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.