OBJECTIVE: To characterize an acquired, symmetric, demyelinating neuropathic variant with distal sensory or sensorimotor features. BACKGROUND: Classic chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) patients have prominent proximal and distal weakness. However, chronic demyelinating neuropathies may present with different phenotypes. An approach that distinguishes these disorders primarily according to the pattern of weakness may be useful to the clinician. METHODS: A total of 53 patients with acquired symmetric demyelinating polyneuropathies were classified primarily according to the pattern of the neuropathy and secondarily according to the presence and type of monoclonal protein (M-protein) in this retrospective review. The authors distinguished between patients with distal sensory or sensorimotor involvement, designated as distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS) neuropathy, from those with proximal and distal weakness, who were designated as CIDP. RESULTS: M-proteins were present in 22% of patients with CIDP. There were no features that distinguished clearly between CIDP patients with or without an M-protein, and nearly all of these patients responded to immunomodulating therapy. In contrast, nearly two-thirds of the patients with DADS neuropathy had immunoglobulin M (IgM) kappa monoclonal gammopathies, and this specific combination predicted a poor response to immunomodulating therapy. Antimyelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) antibodies were present in 67% of these patients. CONCLUSION: Distinguishing acquired demyelinating neuropathies by phenotype can often predict the presence of IgM kappa M-proteins, anti-MAG antibodies, and responses to immunomodulating therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize an acquired, symmetric, demyelinating neuropathic variant with distal sensory or sensorimotor features. BACKGROUND: Classic chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) patients have prominent proximal and distal weakness. However, chronic demyelinating neuropathies may present with different phenotypes. An approach that distinguishes these disorders primarily according to the pattern of weakness may be useful to the clinician. METHODS: A total of 53 patients with acquired symmetric demyelinating polyneuropathies were classified primarily according to the pattern of the neuropathy and secondarily according to the presence and type of monoclonal protein (M-protein) in this retrospective review. The authors distinguished between patients with distal sensory or sensorimotor involvement, designated as distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS) neuropathy, from those with proximal and distal weakness, who were designated as CIDP. RESULTS: M-proteins were present in 22% of patients with CIDP. There were no features that distinguished clearly between CIDPpatients with or without an M-protein, and nearly all of these patients responded to immunomodulating therapy. In contrast, nearly two-thirds of the patients with DADS neuropathy had immunoglobulin M (IgM) kappa monoclonal gammopathies, and this specific combination predicted a poor response to immunomodulating therapy. Antimyelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) antibodies were present in 67% of these patients. CONCLUSION: Distinguishing acquired demyelinating neuropathies by phenotype can often predict the presence of IgM kappa M-proteins, anti-MAG antibodies, and responses to immunomodulating therapy.
Authors: Manoj Mittal; Mamatha Pasnoor; Reddiah B Mummaneni; Saud Khan; April McVey; David Saperstein; Laura Herbelin; Larry Ridings; Yunxia Wang; Mazen M Dimachkie; Richard J Barohn Journal: Int J Neurosci Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 2.292
Authors: Mohamed Mahdi-Rogers; Ruth Brassington; Angela A Gunn; Pieter A van Doorn; Richard Ac Hughes Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-05-08