Literature DB >> 10679628

Evidence for a strong sulfur-aromatic interaction derived from crystallographic data.

R J Zauhar1, C L Colbert, R S Morgan, W J Welsh.   

Abstract

We have uncovered new evidence for a significant interaction between divalent sulfur atoms and aromatic rings. Our study involves a statistical analysis of interatomic distances and other geometric descriptors derived from entries in the Cambridge Crystallographic Database (F. H. Allen and O. Kennard, Chem. Design Auto. News, 1993, Vol. 8, pp. 1 and 31-37). A set of descriptors was defined sufficient in number and type so as to elucidate completely the preferred geometry of interaction between six-membered aromatic carbon rings and divalent sulfurs for all crystal structures of nonmetal-bearing organic compounds present in the database. In order to test statistical significance, analogous probability distributions for the interaction of the moiety X-CH(2)-X with aromatic rings were computed, and taken a priori to correspond to the null hypothesis of no significant interaction. Tests of significance were carried our pairwise between probability distributions of sulfur-aromatic interaction descriptors and their CH(2)-aromatic analogues using the Smirnov-Kolmogorov nonparametric test (W. W. Daniel, Applied Nonparametric Statistics, Houghton-Mifflin: Boston, New York, 1978, pp. 276-286), and in all cases significance at the 99% confidence level or better was observed. Local maxima of the probability distributions were used to define a preferred geometry of interaction between the divalent sulfur moiety and the aromatic ring. Molecular mechanics studies were performed in an effort to better understand the physical basis of the interaction. This study confirms observations based on statistics of interaction of amino acids in protein crystal structures (R. S. Morgan, C. E. Tatsch, R. H. Gushard, J. M. McAdon, and P. K. Warme, International Journal of Peptide Protein Research, 1978, Vol. 11, pp. 209-217; R. S. Morgan and J. M. McAdon, International Journal of Peptide Protein Research, 1980, Vol. 15, pp. 177-180; K. S. C. Reid, P. F. Lindley, and J. M. Thornton, FEBS Letters, 1985, Vol. 190, pp. 209-213), as well as studies involving molecular mechanics (G. Nemethy and H. A. Scheraga, Biochemistry and Biophysics Research Communications, 1981, Vol. 98, pp. 482-487) and quantum chemical calculations (B. V. Cheney, M. W. Schulz, and J. Cheney, Biochimica Biophysica Acta, 1989, Vol. 996, pp.116-124; J. Pranata, Bioorganic Chemistry, 1997, Vol. 25, pp. 213-219)-all of which point to the possible importance of the sulfur-aromatic interaction. However, the preferred geometry of the interaction, as determined from our analysis of the small-molecule crystal data, differs significantly from that found by other approaches. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10679628     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(200003)53:3<233::AID-BIP3>3.0.CO;2-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopolymers        ISSN: 0006-3525            Impact factor:   2.505


  35 in total

1.  Noncovalent interactions in extended systems described by the effective fragment potential method: theory and application to nucleobase oligomers.

Authors:  Debashree Ghosh; Dmytro Kosenkov; Vitalii Vanovschi; Christopher F Williams; John M Herbert; Mark S Gordon; Michael W Schmidt; Lyudmila V Slipchenko; Anna I Krylov
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 2.  Implications of aromatic-aromatic interactions: From protein structures to peptide models.

Authors:  Kamlesh Madhusudan Makwana; Radhakrishnan Mahalakshmi
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Insights into Thiol-Aromatic Interactions: A Stereoelectronic Basis for S-H/π Interactions.

Authors:  Christina R Forbes; Sudipta K Sinha; Himal K Ganguly; Shi Bai; Glenn P A Yap; Sandeep Patel; Neal J Zondlo
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Crystal structures of human CtBP in complex with substrate MTOB reveal active site features useful for inhibitor design.

Authors:  Brendan J Hilbert; Steven R Grossman; Celia A Schiffer; William E Royer
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.124

5.  Models of S/pi interactions in protein structures: comparison of the H2S benzene complex with PDB data.

Authors:  Ashley L Ringer; Anastasia Senenko; C David Sherrill
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Structural and functional insights into TRiC chaperonin from a psychrophilic yeast, Glaciozyma antarctica.

Authors:  Nur Athirah Yusof; Shazilah Kamaruddin; Farah Diba Abu Bakar; Nor Muhammad Mahadi; Abdul Munir Abdul Murad
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.667

7.  Investigation of the nature of the methionine-pi interaction in beta-hairpin peptide model systems.

Authors:  Chad D Tatko; Marcey L Waters
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Structural insights into competitive antagonism in NMDA receptors.

Authors:  Annie Jespersen; Nami Tajima; Gabriela Fernandez-Cuervo; Ethel C Garnier-Amblard; Hiro Furukawa
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The Roles of Several Residues of Escherichia coli DNA Photolyase in the Highly Efficient Photo-Repair of Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimers.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Guoping Zhu
Journal:  J Nucleic Acids       Date:  2010-08-31

10.  Selective and irreversible inhibitors of aphid acetylcholinesterases: steps toward human-safe insecticides.

Authors:  Yuan-Ping Pang; Sanjay K Singh; Yang Gao; T Leon Lassiter; Rajesh K Mishra; Kun Yan Zhu; Stephen Brimijoin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.