Literature DB >> 10678632

Theophylline improves acute mountain sickness.

R Fischer1, S M Lang, U Steiner, M Toepfer, H Hautmann, H Pongratz, R M Huber.   

Abstract

A randomized two-part study was conducted in order to determine the efficacy of theophylline in the treatment of acute mountain sickness during fast ascent to altitudes >2,500 m. Fourteen healthy male subjects participated in a randomized single-blind placebo-controlled crossover study carried out in a decompression chamber (simulated altitude 4,500 m). A second randomized single-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at a high-altitude research laboratory (3,454 m) and included 21 healthy male subjects. The study medication was either 375 mg oral slow-release theophylline (250 mg if <70 kg) or a matched placebo tablet taken twice daily. The acute mountain sickness score (AMSS) was assessed three times a day, beginning 18 h prior to altitude exposure and continuing for 18 h after altitude exposure. In addition, measurements of respiratory frequency, pulse rate, oxygen saturation and arterial blood gas levels were performed. Acute mountain sickness was significantly reduced by theophylline during the decompression chamber study (mean+/-SD 1.2+/-0.9) with placebo versus 3.6+/-0.8 with theophylline; p=0.03). During the high-altitude study, subjects with theophylline showed a significantly lower AMSS on arrival and after 18 h at altitude (0.6 versus 2.3, p=0.03). Oxygenation was improved in both parts of the study. In conclusion, oral slow-release theophylline improves acute mountain sickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10678632     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00.15112300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  7 in total

1.  Adenosine receptor-dependent signaling is not obligatory for normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia-induced cerebral vasodilation in humans.

Authors:  Ryan L Hoiland; Anthony R Bain; Michael M Tymko; Mathew G Rieger; Connor A Howe; Christopher K Willie; Alex B Hansen; Daniela Flück; Kevin W Wildfong; Mike Stembridge; Prajan Subedi; James Anholm; Philip N Ainslie
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2017-01-12

2.  Cheyne stokes breathing at high altitude: a helpful response or a troublemaker?

Authors:  T Küpper; V Schöffl; N Netzer
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 3.  Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 1. Commonly-used classes of drugs.

Authors:  Víctor H Nieto Estrada; Daniel Molano Franco; Roger David Medina; Alejandro G Gonzalez Garay; Arturo J Martí-Carvajal; Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-27

Review 4.  Clinical consequences of altered chemoreflex control.

Authors:  Maria Plataki; Scott A Sands; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 1.931

Review 5.  Interventions for treating acute high altitude illness.

Authors:  Daniel Simancas-Racines; Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez; Dimelza Osorio; Juan Va Franco; Yihan Xu; Ricardo Hidalgo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-30

6.  Fit for high altitude: are hypoxic challenge tests useful?

Authors:  Heinrich Matthys
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2011-02-28

7.  Safety and Ergogenic Properties of Combined Aminophylline and Ambrisentan in Hypoxia.

Authors:  Thies Schroeder; Claude A Piantadosi; Michael J Natoli; Julie Autmizguine; Michael Cohen-Wolkowieczs; Karyn L Hamilton; Christopher Bell; Jelena Klawitter; Uwe Christians; David C Irwin; Robert J Noveck
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 6.875

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.