Literature DB >> 10671583

Renal arterial stenosis: prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.

F De Cobelli1, M Venturini, A Vanzulli, S Sironi, M Salvioni, E Angeli, P Scifo, M P Garancini, R Quartagno, G Bianchi, A Del Maschio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare color Doppler ultrasonography (US) with fast, breath-hold, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in detecting renal arterial stenosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with clinical suspicion of renovascular disease were prospectively examined with intra- and extrarenal color Doppler US and breath-hold, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Digital subtraction arteriography (DSA) was the standard of reference in all patients for the number of renal arteries and degree of stenosis.
RESULTS: DSA depicted 103 arteries and 52 stenoses. Color Doppler US was nondiagnostic in two examinations. Significantly more of 13 accessory renal arteries were detected with MR angiography (n = 12) than with color Doppler US (n = 3; P <.05). For assessing all stenoses, the sensitivity and accuracy were 94% and 91%, respectively, for MR angiography and 71% and 76%, respectively, for US (P <.05). The sensitivity was higher for MR angiography (100%) than for US (79%; P <.05) in diagnosing stenoses with at least 50% narrowing. The specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value in diagnosing stenoses of at least 50% narrowing were 93%, 95%, and 100% for MR angiography and 93%, 89%, and 90% for US.
CONCLUSION: Breath-hold, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is superior to color Doppler US in accessory renal artery detection. Although the specificity of MR angiography is similar to that of color Doppler US, MR angiography has a better sensitivity and negative predictive value in depicting renal arterial stenoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10671583     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe14373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  15 in total

1.  Non-contrast-enhanced MRA of renal artery stenosis: validation against DSA in a porcine model.

Authors:  T A Bley; C J François; M L Schiebler; O Wieben; N Takei; J H Brittain; A Munoz Del Rio; T M Grist; S B Reeder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  First-pass contrast-enhanced renal MRA at 7 Tesla: initial results.

Authors:  L Umutlu; S Maderwald; S Kinner; O Kraff; A K Bitz; S Orzada; S Johst; K Wrede; M Forsting; M E Ladd; T C Lauenstein; H H Quick
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Diagnostic value of 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in Takayasu's arteritis--a comparative study with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Shobhit K Garg; Suyash Mohan; Sunil Kumar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Is MRI equivalent to CT in the guidance of TAVR? A pilot study.

Authors:  Agnes Mayr; Gert Klug; Sebastian J Reinstadler; Hans-Josef Feistritzer; Martin Reindl; Christian Kremser; Christof Kranewitter; Nikolaos Bonaros; Guy Friedrich; Gudrun Feuchtner; Bernhard Metzler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance angiography: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Michael P Hartung; Thomas M Grist; Christopher J François
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Renal artery stenosis: comparative assessment by unenhanced renal artery MRA versus contrast-enhanced MRA.

Authors:  Michael M Y Khoo; Dhafer Deeab; Wladyslaw M W Gedroyc; Neil Duncan; David Taube; Elizabeth A Dick
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Contemporary imaging techniques for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  T Leiner; M W de Haan; P J Nelemans; J M A van Engelshoven; G B C Vasbinder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Diagnosis and management of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: improving patient selection and outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher J White; Jeffrey W Olin
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-03

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the complications of kidney transplantation.

Authors:  M Onniboni; M De Filippo; R Averna; L Coco; M Zompatori; N Sverzellati; C Rossi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Renal artery stenosis: comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA.

Authors:  F Stacul; S Gava; M Belgrano; S Cernic; L Pagnan; F Pozzi Mucelli; M A Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.