Literature DB >> 10668353

Eyeblink classical conditioning: hippocampal formation is for neutral stimulus associations as cerebellum is for association-response.

J T Green1, D S Woodruff-Pak.   

Abstract

Extensive evidence has been amassed that the cerebellum, hippocampus, and associated circuitry are activated during classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane/eyeblink response. In this article, the authors argue that the cerebellum is essential to all eyeblink classical conditioning paradigms. In addition, the septohippocampal system plays a critical role when the classical conditioning paradigm requires the formation of associations in addition to the simple association between the conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. When only a simple conditioned stimulus--unconditioned stimulus association is needed, the septohippocampal system has a more limited, modulatory role. The neutral stimulus association versus simple association-response distinction is one of the ways in which declarative or relational memory can be separated from nondeclarative or nonrelational memory in classical conditioning paradigms.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10668353     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  23 in total

1.  Differential acetylcholine release in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus during pavlovian trace and delay conditioning.

Authors:  M Melissa Flesher; Allen E Butt; Brandee L Kinney-Hurd
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Time-dependent reorganization of the brain components underlying memory retention in trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Kaori Takehara; Shigenori Kawahara; Yutaka Kirino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Nonpharmacological amelioration of age-related learning deficits: the impact of hippocampal theta-triggered training.

Authors:  Yukiko Asaka; Kristin N Mauldin; Amy L Griffin; Matthew A Seager; Elizabeth Shurell; Stephen D Berry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  NMDA receptor-dependent processes in the medial prefrontal cortex are important for acquisition and the early stage of consolidation during trace, but not delay eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Kaori Takehara-Nishiuchi; Shigenori Kawahara; Yutaka Kirino
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Trace eyeblink conditioning in human subjects with cerebellar lesions.

Authors:  M Gerwig; K Haerter; K Hajjar; A Dimitrova; M Maschke; F P Kolb; A F Thilmann; E R Gizewski; D Timmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Eyeblink classical conditioning differentiates normal aging from Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  D S Woodruff-Pak
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun

7.  Prenatal choline availability alters the context sensitivity of Pavlovian conditioning in adult rats.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Lamoureux; Warren H Meck; Christina L Williams
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Polysensory interneuronal projections to foot contractile pedal neurons in Hermissenda.

Authors:  Terry Crow; Lian-Ming Tian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Hippocampal and cerebellar single-unit activity during delay and trace eyeblink conditioning in the rat.

Authors:  John T Green; Jeremy D Arenos
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Subcellular interactions between parallel fibre and climbing fibre signals in Purkinje cells predict sensitivity of classical conditioning to interstimulus interval.

Authors:  Jeanette Hellgren Kotaleski; David Lester; Kim T Blackwell
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.