Literature DB >> 10666374

Sensitive immunoassay of tissue cell proteins procured by laser capture microdissection.

N L Simone1, A T Remaley, L Charboneau, E F Petricoin, J W Glickman, M R Emmert-Buck, T A Fleisher, L A Liotta.   

Abstract

Coupling laser capture microdissection (LCM) with sensitive quantitative chemiluminescent immunoassays has broad applicability in the field of proteomics applied to normal, diseased, or genetically modified tissue. Quantitation of the number of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) molecules/cell was conducted on human prostate tissue cells procured by LCM from fixed and stained frozen sections. Under direct microscopic visualization, laser shots 30 microm in diameter captured specific cells from the heterogeneous tissue section onto a polymer transfer surface. The cellular macromolecules from the captured cells were solubilized in a microvolume of extraction buffer and directly assayed using an automated (1.5 hour) sandwich chemiluminescent immunoassay. Calibration of the chemiluminescent assay was conducted by developing a standard curve using known concentrations of PSA. After the sensitivity, precision, and linearity of the chemiluminescent assay was verified for known numbers of solubilized microdissected tissue cells, it was then possible to calculate the number of PSA molecules per microdissected tissue cell for case samples. In a study set of 20 cases, using 10 replicate samples of 100 laser shots per sample, the within-run (intraassay) SD was approximately 10% of the mean or less for all cases. In this series the number of PSA molecules per microdissected tissue cell ranged from 2 x 10(4) to 6. 3 x 10(6) in normal epithelium, prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and invasive carcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining of human prostate for PSA was compared with the results of the soluble immunoassay for the same prostate tissue section. Independent qualitative scoring of anti-PSA immunohistochemical staining intensity paralleled the LCM quantitative immunoassay for each tissue subpopulation and verified the heterogeneity of PSA content between tissue subpopulations in the same case. Extraction buffers were successfully adapted for both secreted and membrane-bound proteins. This technology has broad applicability for the quantitation of protein molecules in pure populations of tissue cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10666374      PMCID: PMC1850045          DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64749-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9440            Impact factor:   4.307


  16 in total

1.  Laser capture microdissection: molecular analysis of tissue.

Authors:  R F Bonner; M Emmert-Buck; K Cole; T Pohida; R Chuaqui; S Goldstein; L A Liotta
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-11-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The laser in the Lowry technique for microdissection of freeze-dried tissue slices.

Authors:  W Meier-Ruge; W Bielser; E Remy; F Hillenkamp; R Nitsche; R Unsöld
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1976-07

3.  Immunoelectron microscopic localization of prostatic-specific antigen in human prostate by the protein A-gold complex.

Authors:  A A Sinha; M J Wilson; D F Gleason
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Quantitative histochemical analysis of glycolytic intermediates and cofactors with an oil well technique.

Authors:  F M Matschinsky; J V Passonneau; O H Lowry
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  In situ hybridization of prostate-specific antigen mRNA in human prostate.

Authors:  S D Qiu; C Y Young; D L Bilhartz; J L Prescott; G M Farrow; W W He; D J Tindall
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Immunohistochemical localization of prostate-specific acid phosphatase and prostate-specific antigen in stage A2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate: prognostic implications.

Authors:  J I Epstein; J C Eggleston
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Early detection of residual prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy by an ultrasensitive assay for prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  T A Stamey; H C Graves; N Wehner; M Ferrari; F S Freiha
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Immunocytochemical evaluation of human prostatic carcinomas for carcinoembryonic antigen, nonspecific cross-reacting antigen, beta-chorionic gonadotrophin, and prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  D M Purnell; B M Heatfield; B F Trump
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Quantitation of prostate-specific antigen in serum by a sensitive enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  M Kuriyama; M C Wang; L D Papsidero; C S Killian; T Shimano; L Valenzuela; T Nishiura; G P Murphy; T M Chu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Laser-capture microdissection: opening the microscopic frontier to molecular analysis.

Authors:  N L Simone; R F Bonner; J W Gillespie; M R Emmert-Buck; L A Liotta
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.639

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Laser capture microdissection: beyond functional genomics to proteomics.

Authors:  N L Simone; C P Paweletz; L Charboneau; E F Petricoin; L A Liotta
Journal:  Mol Diagn       Date:  2000-12

2.  Laser capture microdissection and two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis: evaluation of tissue preparation and sample limitations.

Authors:  Rachel A Craven; Nick Totty; Patricia Harnden; Peter J Selby; Rosamonde E Banks
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Protein analysis through Western blot of cells excised individually from human brain and muscle tissue.

Authors:  A O Koob; L Bruns; C Prassler; E Masliah; T Klopstock; A Bender
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Direct analysis of laser capture microdissected cells by MALDI mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Baogang J Xu; Richard M Caprioli; Melinda E Sanders; Roy A Jensen
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 5.  Optimal molecular profiling of tissue and tissue components: defining the best processing and microdissection methods for biomedical applications.

Authors:  G Steven Bova; Isam A Eltoum; John A Kiernan; Gene P Siegal; Andra R Frost; Carolyn J M Best; John W Gillespie; Gloria H Su; Michael R Emmert-Buck
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Quantification of diverse subcellular immunohistochemical markers with clinicobiological relevancies: validation of a new computer-assisted image analysis procedure.

Authors:  Marylène Lejeune; Joaquín Jaén; Lluis Pons; Carlos López; Maria-Teresa Salvadó; Ramón Bosch; Marcial García; Patricia Escrivà; Jordi Baucells; Xavier Cugat; Tomás Alvaro
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Novel tissue preparation method and cell-specific marker for laser microdissection of Arabidopsis mature leaf.

Authors:  Noriko Inada; Mary C Wildermuth
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.116

8.  Immunohistochemistry as an important tool in biomarkers detection and clinical practice.

Authors:  Leandro Luongo de Matos; Damila Cristina Trufelli; Maria Graciela Luongo de Matos; Maria Aparecida da Silva Pinhal
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2010-02-09

9.  Identification of crystallin modifications in the human lens cortex and nucleus using laser capture microdissection and CyDye labeling.

Authors:  C O Asomugha; R Gupta; O P Srivastava
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 2.367

Review 10.  Target identification for CNS diseases by transcriptional profiling.

Authors:  C Anthony Altar; Marquis P Vawter; Stephen D Ginsberg
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.