Literature DB >> 10666354

Safety and prognostic value of early dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in patients with spontaneous chest pain and a non-diagnostic electrocardiogram.

M L Geleijnse1, A Elhendy, J D Kasprzak, R Rambaldi, R T van Domburg, J H Cornel, A P Klootwijk, P M Fioretti, J R Roelandt, M L Simoons.   

Abstract

AIMS: To risk stratify and shorten hospital stay in patients with spontaneous (resting) chest pain and a non-diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG). METHODS AND
RESULTS: The study comprised 102 patients (mean age 58+/-12 years, 67 men) with spontaneous chest pain and a non-diagnostic ECG. Forty-three patients had suspected coronary artery disease and 59 had known (but of unknown actual significance) coronary artery disease. All patients underwent serial creatine kinase enzyme measurements, continuous ECG monitoring for at least 12 h and early dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in patients with negative creatine kinase enzymes and normal findings at ECG monitoring. Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography was considered positive in patients with new or worsening wall thickening abnormalities. Patients with negative dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography were discharged after the test. In-hospital and 6 month follow-up events noted were cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and coronary artery bypass surgery or angioplasty. Thirteen patients had evidence of evolving myocardial infarction by elevated creatine kinase enzymes, or unstable angina by ECG monitoring. In the remaining 89 patients, dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography was performed after a median observation period of 31 h (range 12-68 h). During dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography no serious complications (death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) occurred. Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography results were of poor quality in three, non-diagnostic in six, negative in 44 and positive in 36 patients. In the 80 patients with diagnostic dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography, variables associated with in-hospital events (n=7) were history of exertional angina (P<0. 005), chest pain score (P<0.005), stress-induced angina (P<0.001) and positive dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (P<0.005). Variables associated with follow-up events (n=11) were history of exertional angina (P<0.05), chest pain score (P<0.001), stress-induced angina (P<0.01) and positive dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (P<0.01). At multivariate analysis the only significant predictor of events was positive dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (P<0.01).
CONCLUSION: Early dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography may safely distinguish between low- and high-risk subsets for subsequent cardiac events in patients with spontaneous chest pain and a non-diagnostic ECG. Copyright 2000 The European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10666354     DOI: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  10 in total

1.  It's tough to make predictions...

Authors:  Wayne Warnica
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 5.223

2.  Prognostic value of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance and dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with low-risk chest pain.

Authors:  Gregory Hartlage; Matthew Janik; Athanasios Anadiotis; Emir Veledar; John Oshinski; Dimitrios Kremastinos; Arthur Stillman; Stamatios Lerakis
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Risk stratification of patients with acute chest pain and normal troponin concentrations.

Authors:  J Sanchis; V Bodí; A Llácer; J Núñez; L Consuegra; M J Bosch; V Bertomeu; V Ruiz; F J Chorro
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Ezra A Amsterdam; J Douglas Kirk; David A Bluemke; Deborah Diercks; Michael E Farkouh; J Lee Garvey; Michael C Kontos; James McCord; Todd D Miller; Anthony Morise; L Kristin Newby; Frederick L Ruberg; Kristine Anne Scordo; Paul D Thompson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Comparison of traditional cardiovascular risk models and coronary atherosclerotic plaque as detected by computed tomography for prediction of acute coronary syndrome in patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Maros Ferencik; Christopher L Schlett; Fabian Bamberg; Quynh A Truong; John H Nichols; Antonio J Pena; Michael D Shapiro; Ian S Rogers; Sujith Seneviratne; Blair Alden Parry; Ricardo C Cury; Thomas J Brady; David F Brown; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Limitations of risk score models in patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Alex F Manini; Nina Dannemann; David F Brown; Javed Butler; Fabian Bamberg; John T Nagurney; John H Nichols; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.469

7.  Efficacy of coronary revascularization in patients with acute chest pain managed in a chest pain unit.

Authors:  Juan Sanchis; Vicent Bodí; Julio Núñez; Luis Mainar; Eduardo Núñez; Pilar Merlos; Eva Rúmiz; Gema Miñana; Xavier Bosch; Angel Llácer
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Effective combination of isolated symptom variables to help stratifying acute undifferentiated chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  Wen Zheng; Jingjing Ma; Shuo Wu; Guangmei Wang; He Zhang; Jiaqi Zheng; Feng Xu; Jiali Wang; Yuguo Chen
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Correlates of Delayed Initial Contact to Emergency Services among Patients with Suspected ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Osayi Lawani; Nicholas Gorman; Fiona Gorman; Jiries Ganim; Stefano Sdringola-Maranga
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 1.866

10.  Admission criteria for a cardiovascular short stay unit: a retrospective analysis on a pilot unit.

Authors:  Federico Capone; Leonardo Molinari; Marianna Noale; Lorenzo Previato; Sandro Giannini; Gianna Vettore; Fabrizio Fabris; Alois Saller
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.397

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.