Literature DB >> 10666139

Type of negative feedback controlling sucrose ingestion depends on sucrose concentration.

J D Davis1, G P Smith, B Singh.   

Abstract

The sham intake of concentrated, but not weak, milk solutions requires up to three sham-feeding tests for intake to reach maximum (7). It is well known that the sham intake of concentrated (0.8 M) sucrose requires three or more sham-feeding tests to reach its maximum (4, 6, 17), but it is not known if this occurs with weaker sucrose solutions. We investigated this question by measuring the sham intake of seven concentrations of sucrose (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0. 2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 M) during five sham-feeding tests. Sham intake of the three highest concentrations required up to three sham-feeding tests to reach maximum. Sham intake of the four lowest concentrations reached maximum in the first sham-feeding test. Our results show that the type of negative feedback that controls the intake of sucrose depends on its concentration. With weak solutions, intake is limited by a single direct, physiological, negative-feedback signal. When concentrated solutions are ingested, intake is controlled jointly by a direct physiological signal operating in conjunction with a labile one that loses its effectiveness with sham-feeding experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10666139     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.2000.278.2.R383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  8 in total

1.  A comparison of the effects of the CB(1) receptor antagonist SR141716A, pre-feeding and changed palatability on the microstructure of ingestive behaviour.

Authors:  Zoë D Thornton-Jones; Guy A Kennett; Steven P Vickers; Peter G Clifton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Pontine and thalamic influences on fluid rewards: I. Operant responding for sucrose and corn oil.

Authors:  Nu-Chu Liang; Christopher S Freet; Patricia S Grigson; Ralph Norgren
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-06-16

Review 3.  Remembering to eat: hippocampal regulation of meal onset.

Authors:  Marise B Parent; Jenna N Darling; Yoko O Henderson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Neurons with diverse phenotypes project from the caudal to the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract.

Authors:  Susan Travers; Joseph Breza; Jacob Harley; JiuLin Zhu; Joseph Travers
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Taste does not determine daily intake of dilute sugar solutions in mice.

Authors:  J I Glendinning; F Beltran; L Benton; S Cheng; J Gieseke; J Gillman; H N Spain
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Proceedings of the 2015 ASPEN Research Workshop-Taste Signaling.

Authors:  Alan C Spector; Carel W le Roux; Steven D Munger; Susan P Travers; Anthony Sclafani; Julie A Mennella
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Expression of Fos during sham sucrose intake in rats with central gustatory lesions.

Authors:  Suriyaphun S Mungarndee; Robert F Lundy; Ralph Norgren
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Inhibiting ventral hippocampal NMDA receptors and Arc increases energy intake in male rats.

Authors:  Sherri B Briggs; Reilly Hannapel; Janavi Ramesh; Marise B Parent
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.699

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.