Literature DB >> 10664231

DNase use in the daily care of cystic fibrosis: who benefits from it and to what extent? Results of a cohort study of 199 patients in 13 centres. DNase National Study Group.

N Cobos1, I Danés, S Gartner, M González, S Liñán, J M Arnau.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Short-term clinical trials with DNase have shown minor to moderate benefits in cystic fibrosis patients. This study was performed to analyse the effectiveness of DNase use in daily practice and to obtain information on its effects in the long term and at different disease stages. Patients being treated in 13 specialised units were included if they started DNase treatment before June 1996. Baseline data before DNase use and data during the DNase treatment period were recorded. Of the 199 patients included in the study 166 continued on DNase treatment while the data were being collected. The mean age (95% CI) was 14.5 (13.7; 15,2) years; 103 (51.8%) patients were female. The mean maximum change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) was observed during the first month of treatment [11.1% (6.1; 16.1)]. By the end of the first and the second year of treatment mean changes in FEV(1) were 3.3% (-1.1; 7. 6) and 5.1% (-0.7; 10.9) respectively; at the end of the same periods 34% of patients had improved their baseline FEV(1) by 10% or more but in around 50% of patients the level fell below the baseline. A large inter-individual variability in changes in pulmonary function after the start of DNase treatment was documented. In addition, the medium-term response to treatment was correlated with early response during the first 3 months. No consistent changes in exacerbation pattern were found during the first year of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of DNase use in daily practice are limited but apparently can be maintained in the medium term in some patients. A large inter-individual variability in response to DNase treatment has been documented and the benefits are doubtful in around 50% of patients. This observation points to the need to set up a withdrawal trial in these patients, using as an eligibility criterion the early response observed during the first 3 months of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10664231     DOI: 10.1007/s004310050046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  6 in total

Review 1.  Getting Drugs Across Biological Barriers.

Authors:  Rong Yang; Tuo Wei; Hannah Goldberg; Weiping Wang; Kathleen Cullion; Daniel S Kohane
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 30.849

2.  Longitudinal association between medication adherence and lung health in people with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Michelle N Eakin; Andrew Bilderback; Michael P Boyle; Peter J Mogayzel; Kristin A Riekert
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Role of magnesium in the failure of rhDNase therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  N N Sanders; H Franckx; K De Boeck; J Haustraete; S C De Smedt; J Demeester
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  Cystic fibrosis: cost of illness and considerations for the economic evaluation of potential therapies.

Authors:  Christian Krauth; Noushin Jalilvand; Tobias Welte; Reinhard Busse
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Review of recombinant human deoxyribonuclease (rhDNase) in the management of patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Tacjana Pressler
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2008-12

6.  Actin-Resistant DNase1L2 as a Potential Therapeutics for CF Lung Disease.

Authors:  Danila Delfino; Giulia Mori; Claudio Rivetti; Antonella Grigoletto; Gloria Bizzotto; Cristian Cavozzi; Marco Malatesta; Davide Cavazzini; Gianfranco Pasut; Riccardo Percudani
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-03-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.