Literature DB >> 10653746

Effect of increased yeast alcohol acetyltransferase activity on flavor profiles of wine and distillates.

M Lilly1, M G Lambrechts, I S Pretorius.   

Abstract

The distinctive flavor of wine, brandy, and other grape-derived alcoholic beverages is affected by many compounds, including esters produced during alcoholic fermentation. The characteristic fruity odors of the fermentation bouquet are primarily due to a mixture of hexyl acetate, ethyl caproate (apple-like aroma), iso-amyl acetate (banana-like aroma), ethyl caprylate (apple-like aroma), and 2-phenylethyl acetate (fruity, flowery flavor with a honey note). The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of improving the aroma of wine and distillates by overexpressing one of the endogenous yeast genes that controls acetate ester production during fermentation. The synthesis of acetate esters by the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae during fermentation is ascribed to at least three acetyltransferase activities, namely, alcohol acetyltransferase (AAT), ethanol acetyltransferase, and iso-amyl AAT. To investigate the effect of increased AAT activity on the sensory quality of Chenin blanc wines and distillates from Colombar base wines, we have overexpressed the alcohol acetyltransferase gene (ATF1) of S. cerevisiae. The ATF1 gene, located on chromosome XV, was cloned from a widely used commercial wine yeast strain of S. cerevisiae, VIN13, and placed under the control of the constitutive yeast phosphoglycerate kinase gene (PGK1) promoter and terminator. Chromoblot analysis confirmed the integration of the modified copy of ATF1 into the genome of three commercial wine yeast strains (VIN7, VIN13, and WE228). Northern blot analysis indicated constitutive expression of ATF1 at high levels in these yeast transformants. The levels of ethyl acetate, iso-amyl acetate, and 2-phenylethyl acetate increased 3- to 10-fold, 3.8- to 12-fold, and 2- to 10-fold, respectively, depending on the fermentation temperature, cultivar, and yeast strain used. The concentrations of ethyl caprate, ethyl caprylate, and hexyl acetate only showed minor changes, whereas the acetic acid concentration decreased by more than half. These changes in the wine and distillate composition had a pronounced effect on the solvent or chemical aroma (associated with ethyl acetate and iso-amyl acetate) and the herbaceous and heads-associated aromas of the final distillate and the solvent or chemical and fruity or flowery characters of the Chenin blanc wines. This study establishes the concept that the overexpression of acetyltransferase genes such as ATF1 could profoundly affect the flavor profiles of wines and distillates deficient in aroma, thereby paving the way for the production of products maintaining a fruitier character for longer periods after bottling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10653746      PMCID: PMC91891          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.2.744-753.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  11 in total

1.  New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites.

Authors:  R D Gietz; A Sugino
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1988-12-30       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 2.  Flavor composition of wines: a review.

Authors:  P Schreier
Journal:  CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  1979-11

3.  Effect of aeration and unsaturated fatty acids on expression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae alcohol acetyltransferase gene.

Authors:  T Fujii; O Kobayashi; H Yoshimoto; S Furukawa; Y Tamai
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Muc1, a mucin-like protein that is regulated by Mss10, is critical for pseudohyphal differentiation in yeast.

Authors:  M G Lambrechts; F F Bauer; J Marmur; I S Pretorius
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Engineering pathways for malate degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  H Volschenk; M Viljoen; J Grobler; B Petzold; F Bauer; R E Subden; R A Young; A Lonvaud; M Denayrolles; H J van Vuuren
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Molecular cloning, sequence analysis, and expression of the yeast alcohol acetyltransferase gene.

Authors:  T Fujii; N Nagasawa; A Iwamatsu; T Bogaki; Y Tamai; M Hamachi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Construction of a set of convenient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C.

Authors:  F Winston; C Dollard; S L Ricupero-Hovasse
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.239

8.  The value of electrophoretic fingerprinting and karyotyping in wine yeast breeding programmes.

Authors:  T J van der Westhuizen; I S Pretorius
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.271

9.  An electrophoretic karyotype for yeast.

Authors:  G F Carle; M V Olson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Site-directed mutagenesis of the yeast actin gene: a test for actin function in vivo.

Authors:  F J Johannes; D Gallwitz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  59 in total

1.  Enhanced leavening properties of baker's yeast overexpressing MAL62 with deletion of MIG1 in lean dough.

Authors:  Xi Sun; Cuiying Zhang; Jian Dong; Mingyue Wu; Yan Zhang; Dongguang Xiao
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Genetic determinants of volatile-thiol release by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation.

Authors:  Kate S Howell; Mathias Klein; Jan H Swiegers; Yoji Hayasaka; Gordon M Elsey; Graham H Fleet; Peter B Høj; Isak S Pretorius; Miguel A de Barros Lopes
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Effect of different fermentation conditions on the kinetic parameters and production of volatile compounds during the elaboration of a prickly pear distilled beverage.

Authors:  J Arrizon; C Calderón; G Sandoval
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Reduced production of diacetyl by overexpressing BDH2 gene and ILV5 gene in yeast of the lager brewers with one ILV2 allelic gene deleted.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Shi; Ping Li; Shi-Jia Chen; Ye-Fu Chen; Xue-Wu Guo; Dong-Guang Xiao
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Enhanced leavening ability of baker's yeast by overexpression of SNR84 with PGM2 deletion.

Authors:  Xue Lin; Cui-Ying Zhang; Xiao-Wen Bai; Dong-Guang Xiao
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Effects of MAL61 and MAL62 overexpression on maltose fermentation of baker's yeast in lean dough.

Authors:  Cui-Ying Zhang; Xue Lin; Hai-Yan Song; Dong-Guang Xiao
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Comparison of two alternative dominant selectable markers for wine yeast transformation.

Authors:  Eduardo Cebollero; Ramon Gonzalez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Effect of Agave tequilana age, cultivation field location and yeast strain on tequila fermentation process.

Authors:  L Pinal; E Cornejo; M Arellano; E Herrera; L Nuñez; J Arrizon; A Gschaedler
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Parameters affecting ethyl ester production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during fermentation.

Authors:  S M G Saerens; F Delvaux; K J Verstrepen; P Van Dijck; J M Thevelein; F R Delvaux
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Performance evaluation of Pichia kluyveri, Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in industrial tequila fermentation.

Authors:  L Amaya-Delgado; E J Herrera-López; Javier Arrizon; M Arellano-Plaza; A Gschaedler
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.