Literature DB >> 10653508

Decision-induced focusing in social dilemmas: give-some, keep-some, take-some, and leave-some dilemmas.

E van Dijk1, H Wilke.   

Abstract

Previous research on asymmetric social dilemmas has suggested that public good dilemmas evoke different choice behaviors than do resource dilemmas. The authors propose that these differences reflect a differential focus that is dependent on the way decisions are generally presented in the dilemma types. In agreement with this, the results of 2 experimental studies suggest that, in public good dilemmas, group members are less focused on the consequences of their actions for the final outcome distribution when deciding how many endowments they give to the public good than when deciding how many endowments they keep for themselves. In resource dilemmas, group members are less focused on the final outcome distribution when deciding how many endowments they leave in the collective resource than when deciding how many endowments they take.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10653508     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.1.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  3 in total

1.  The Neural Mechanism of the Social Framing Effect: Evidence from fMRI and tDCS Studies.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Ruolei Gu; Chong Liao; Juanzhi Lu; Yuxing Fang; Pengfei Xu; Yue-Jia Luo; Fang Cui
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Do good actions inspire good actions in others?

Authors:  Valerio Capraro; Alessandra Marcelletti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The climate commons dilemma: how can humanity solve the commons dilemma for the global climate commons?

Authors:  Yang Li; David K Sewell; Saam Saber; Daniel B Shank; Yoshihisa Kashima
Journal:  Clim Change       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 4.743

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.