Literature DB >> 10653028

Muscle contributions to specific biomechanical functions do not change in forward versus backward pedaling.

R R Neptune1, S A Kautz, F E Zajac.   

Abstract

Previous work had identified six biomechanical functions that need to be executed by each limb in order to produce a variety of pedaling tasks. The functions can be organized into three antagonistic pairs: an Ext/Flex pair that accelerates the foot into extension or flexion with respect to the pelvis, an Ant/Post pair that accelerates the foot anteriorly or posteriorly with respect to the pelvis, and a Plant/Dorsi pair that accelerates the foot into plantarflexion or dorsiflexion. Previous analyses of experimental data have inferred that muscles perform the same function during different pedaling tasks (e.g. forward versus backward pedaling) because the EMG timing was similar, but they did not present rigorous biomechanical analyses to assess whether a muscle performed the same biomechanical function, and if so, to what degree. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine how individual muscles contribute to these biomechanical functions during two different motor tasks, forward and backward pedaling, through a theoretical analysis of experimental data. To achieve this objective, forward and backward pedaling simulations were generated and a mechanical energy analysis was used to examine how muscles generate, absorb or transfer energy to perform the pedaling tasks. The results showed that the muscles contributed to the same primary Biomechanical functions in both pedaling directions and that synergistic performance of certain functions effectively accelerated the crank. The gluteus maximus worked synergistically with the soleus, the hip flexors worked synergistically with the tibialis anterior, and the vasti and hamstrings functioned independently to accelerate the crank. The rectus femoris used complex biomechanical mechanisms including negative muscle work to accelerate the crank. The negative muscle work was used to transfer energy generated elsewhere (primarily from other muscles) to the pedal reaction force in order to accelerate the crank. Consistent with experimental data, a phase shift was required from those muscles contributing to the Ant/Post functions as a result of the different limb kinematics between forward and backward pedaling, although they performed the same biomechanical function. The pedaling simulations proved necessary to interpret the experimental data and identify motor control mechanisms used to accomplish specific motor tasks, as the mechanisms were often complex and not always intuitively obvious.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10653028     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00150-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  16 in total

1.  Physiological responses during cycling with noncircular "Harmonic" and circular chainrings.

Authors:  Sébastien Ratel; Pascale Duché; Christophe A Hautier; Craig A Williams; Mario Bedu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Similar muscles contribute to horizontal and vertical acceleration of center of mass in forward and backward walking: implications for neural control.

Authors:  Karen Jansen; Friedl De Groote; Firas Massaad; Pieter Meyns; Jacques Duysens; Ilse Jonkers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Muscle gearing during isotonic and isokinetic movements in the ankle plantarflexors.

Authors:  Avleen Randhawa; Meghan E Jackman; James M Wakeling
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Age-related differences in adaptation during childhood: the influences of muscular power production and segmental energy flow caused by muscles.

Authors:  Thomas Korff; Jody L Jensen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The role of the slope of oxygen consumption and EMG activity on freely chosen pedal rate selection.

Authors:  Nicolas Bessot; Sébastien Moussay; Sylvain Laborde; Antoine Gauthier; Bruno Sesboüé; Damien Davenne
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Differences between the Vastus Lateralis and Gastrocnemius Lateralis in the Assessment Ability of Breakpoints of Muscle Oxygenation for Aerobic Capacity Indices During an Incremental Cycling Exercise.

Authors:  Bangde Wang; Guodong Xu; Qingping Tian; Jinyan Sun; Bailei Sun; Lei Zhang; Qingming Luo; Hui Gong
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  A simple experimentally based model using proprioceptive regulation of motor primitives captures adjusted trajectory formation in spinal frogs.

Authors:  William J Kargo; Arun Ramakrishnan; Corey B Hart; Lawrence C Rome; Simon F Giszter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Effects of bicycle saddle height on knee injury risk and cycling performance.

Authors:  Rodrigo Bini; Patria A Hume; James L Croft
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke.

Authors:  David J Clark; Lena H Ting; Felix E Zajac; Richard R Neptune; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Modular control of human walking: a simulation study.

Authors:  Richard R Neptune; David J Clark; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.