HYPOTHESIS: Speech perception outcomes for cochlear implantation of children vary over a wide range, and it is hypothesized that central pathologic states associated with certain causes of hearing impairment account for a substantial part of the variance. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was carried out to ascertain the relationships between speech perception, etiologic factors, and central pathologic states as indicated by preoperative delayed motor milestones and/or cognitive delays. SETTING: Data were obtained from the pre- and postoperative records of patients attending a hospital cochlear implant clinic. PATIENTS: Results for 75 consecutive patients up to age 5 years who underwent implantation were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Patients received a 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis and were seen by the clinic for regular tune-up and assessments. Home- and school-based habilitation was recommended by the clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception measures were classified on a five-point scale to allow for different evaluation procedures at different ages and developmental stages. RESULTS: The incidence of motor and cognitive delays were fairly evenly spread across etiologic factors, except for cytomegalovirus, which had a much higher than average incidence. Children with motor and/or cognitive delays were significantly slower than other children in the development of speech perception skills after implantation. Etiologic factors did not have a statistically significant effect on speech perception outcome. CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that central pathologic states account for a substantial part of the variance among children using cochlear implants. Specific indicators of central pathologic states should be used to assess a child's prognosis in preference to less specific information based on etiologic factors alone.
HYPOTHESIS: Speech perception outcomes for cochlear implantation of children vary over a wide range, and it is hypothesized that central pathologic states associated with certain causes of hearing impairment account for a substantial part of the variance. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was carried out to ascertain the relationships between speech perception, etiologic factors, and central pathologic states as indicated by preoperative delayed motor milestones and/or cognitive delays. SETTING: Data were obtained from the pre- and postoperative records of patients attending a hospital cochlear implant clinic. PATIENTS: Results for 75 consecutive patients up to age 5 years who underwent implantation were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Patients received a 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis and were seen by the clinic for regular tune-up and assessments. Home- and school-based habilitation was recommended by the clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception measures were classified on a five-point scale to allow for different evaluation procedures at different ages and developmental stages. RESULTS: The incidence of motor and cognitive delays were fairly evenly spread across etiologic factors, except for cytomegalovirus, which had a much higher than average incidence. Children with motor and/or cognitive delays were significantly slower than other children in the development of speech perception skills after implantation. Etiologic factors did not have a statistically significant effect on speech perception outcome. CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that central pathologic states account for a substantial part of the variance among children using cochlear implants. Specific indicators of central pathologic states should be used to assess a child's prognosis in preference to less specific information based on etiologic factors alone.
Authors: Linda Cupples; Teresa Y C Ching; Kathryn Crowe; Mark Seeto; Greg Leigh; Laura Street; Julia Day; Vivienne Marnane; Jessica Thomson Journal: J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ Date: 2013-10-21
Authors: Linda Cupples; Teresa Y C Ching; Laura Button; Greg Leigh; Vivienne Marnane; Jessica Whitfield; Miriam Gunnourie; Louise Martin Journal: Int J Audiol Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 2.117
Authors: Jennifer M Barnard; Laurel M Fisher; Karen C Johnson; Laurie S Eisenberg; Nae-Yuh Wang; Alexandra L Quittner; Christine M Carson; John K Niparko Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Stefan Lyutenski; Friedrich Götz; Alexandros Giourgas; Omid Majdani; Eva Bültmann; Heinrich Lanfermann; Thomas Lenarz; Anja M Giesemann Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 2.503